LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: tglx@linutronix.de, fenghua.yu@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
	vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com
Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com, jithu.joseph@intel.com,
	dave.hansen@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V4 26/38] x86/intel_rdt: Split resource group removal in two
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 04:29:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <352ea45fd2e2981934cf14a2ed21e2c94a072a2a.1526987654.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1526987654.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1526987654.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com>

Resource groups used for pseudo-locking do not require the same work on
removal as the other resource groups.

The resource group removal is split in two in preparation for support of
pseudo-locking resource groups. A single re-ordering occurs - the
setting of the rdtgrp flag is moved to later. This flag is not used by
any of the code between its original and new location.

Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c
index 31dd9a2cc394..b7509ec336df 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c
@@ -2565,6 +2565,21 @@ static int rdtgroup_rmdir_mon(struct kernfs_node *kn, struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int rdtgroup_ctrl_remove(struct kernfs_node *kn,
+				struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp)
+{
+	rdtgrp->flags = RDT_DELETED;
+	list_del(&rdtgrp->rdtgroup_list);
+
+	/*
+	 * one extra hold on this, will drop when we kfree(rdtgrp)
+	 * in rdtgroup_kn_unlock()
+	 */
+	kernfs_get(kn);
+	kernfs_remove(rdtgrp->kn);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int rdtgroup_rmdir_ctrl(struct kernfs_node *kn, struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp,
 			       cpumask_var_t tmpmask)
 {
@@ -2590,7 +2605,6 @@ static int rdtgroup_rmdir_ctrl(struct kernfs_node *kn, struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp,
 	cpumask_or(tmpmask, tmpmask, &rdtgrp->cpu_mask);
 	update_closid_rmid(tmpmask, NULL);
 
-	rdtgrp->flags = RDT_DELETED;
 	closid_free(rdtgrp->closid);
 	free_rmid(rdtgrp->mon.rmid);
 
@@ -2599,14 +2613,7 @@ static int rdtgroup_rmdir_ctrl(struct kernfs_node *kn, struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp,
 	 */
 	free_all_child_rdtgrp(rdtgrp);
 
-	list_del(&rdtgrp->rdtgroup_list);
-
-	/*
-	 * one extra hold on this, will drop when we kfree(rdtgrp)
-	 * in rdtgroup_kn_unlock()
-	 */
-	kernfs_get(kn);
-	kernfs_remove(rdtgrp->kn);
+	rdtgroup_ctrl_remove(kn, rdtgrp);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.13.6

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-22 19:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-22 11:28 [PATCH V4 00/38] Intel(R) Resource Director Technology Cache Pseudo-Locking enabling Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:28 ` [PATCH V4 01/38] x86/intel_rdt: Document new mode, size, and bit_usage Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:28 ` [PATCH V4 02/38] x86/intel_rdt: Introduce RDT resource group mode Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:28 ` [PATCH V4 03/38] x86/intel_rdt: Associate mode with each RDT resource group Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:28 ` [PATCH V4 04/38] x86/intel_rdt: Introduce resource group's mode resctrl file Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:28 ` [PATCH V4 05/38] x86/intel_rdt: Introduce test to determine if closid is in use Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:28 ` [PATCH V4 06/38] x86/intel_rdt: Make useful functions available internally Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:28 ` [PATCH V4 07/38] x86/intel_rdt: Initialize new resource group with sane defaults Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:28 ` [PATCH V4 08/38] x86/intel_rdt: Introduce new "exclusive" mode Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:28 ` [PATCH V4 09/38] x86/intel_rdt: Enable setting of exclusive mode Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:28 ` [PATCH V4 10/38] x86/intel_rdt: Making CBM name and type more explicit Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:28 ` [PATCH V4 11/38] x86/intel_rdt: Support flexible data to parsing callbacks Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 12/38] x86/intel_rdt: Ensure requested schemata respects mode Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 13/38] x86/intel_rdt: Introduce "bit_usage" to display cache allocations details Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 21:03   ` Randy Dunlap
2018-05-22 21:09     ` Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 14/38] x86/intel_rdt: Display resource groups' allocations' size in bytes Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 15/38] x86/intel_rdt: Documentation for Cache Pseudo-Locking Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 16/38] x86/intel_rdt: Introduce the Cache Pseudo-Locking modes Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 17/38] x86/intel_rdt: Respect read and write access Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 18/38] x86/intel_rdt: Add utility to test if tasks assigned to resource group Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 19/38] x86/intel_rdt: Add utility to restrict/restore access to resctrl files Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 20/38] x86/intel_rdt: Protect against resource group changes during locking Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 21/38] x86/intel_rdt: Utilities to restrict/restore access to specific files Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 22/38] x86/intel_rdt: Add check to determine if monitoring in progress Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 23/38] x86/intel_rdt: Introduce pseudo-locked region Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 24/38] x86/intel_rdt: Support enter/exit of locksetup mode Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 25/38] x86/intel_rdt: Enable entering of pseudo-locksetup mode Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 27/38] x86/intel_rdt: Add utilities to test pseudo-locked region possibility Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 28/38] x86/intel_rdt: Discover supported platforms via prefetch disable bits Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 29/38] x86/intel_rdt: Pseudo-lock region creation/removal core Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 30/38] x86/intel_rdt: Support creation/removal of pseudo-locked region Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 31/38] x86/intel_rdt: resctrl files reflect pseudo-locked information Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 32/38] x86/intel_rdt: Ensure RDT cleanup on exit Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 33/38] x86/intel_rdt: Create resctrl debug area Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 34/38] x86/intel_rdt: Create debugfs files for pseudo-locking testing Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 19:43   ` Greg KH
2018-05-22 21:02     ` Reinette Chatre
2018-05-23  8:05       ` Greg KH
2018-05-23 17:19         ` Reinette Chatre
2018-05-23 17:27           ` Greg KH
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 35/38] x86/intel_rdt: Create character device exposing pseudo-locked region Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 36/38] x86/intel_rdt: More precise L2 hit/miss measurements Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 37/38] x86/intel_rdt: Support L3 cache performance event of Broadwell Reinette Chatre
2018-05-22 11:29 ` [PATCH V4 38/38] x86/intel_rdt: Limit C-states dynamically when pseudo-locking active Reinette Chatre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=352ea45fd2e2981934cf14a2ed21e2c94a072a2a.1526987654.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=gavin.hindman@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jithu.joseph@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH V4 26/38] x86/intel_rdt: Split resource group removal in two' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).