LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tor Vic <torvic9@mailbox.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com" 
	<clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86, Makefile: Move the CPU-specific 64-bit tuning settings to arch/x86/Makefile.cpu
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 18:28:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <35f9422c-4cde-af6a-d56c-500b66d6f1f0@mailbox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOdkpJc66DWTJV1qTZ6ch-qLxf+g-mJnLmP0ea396P1oYmA@mail.gmail.com>



On 17.08.21 17:58, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Tor,
> Thanks for the patches. One thing I always try to do is use
> ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl to get the appropriate maintainers and
> reviewers cc'ed. I prefer to explicitly put the maintainers that I
> expect to pick up a patch in the To: line.
> 

I did use the script, but I wasn't sure whether to include groups,
individuals, or both.
Noted for next submission.

> $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl arch/x86/Makefile -norolestats
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> x86@kernel.org
> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
> 
> added them to CC.  Probably needs a refresh at this point, but
> https://nickdesaulniers.github.io/blog/2017/05/16/submitting-your-first-patch-to-the-linux-kernel-and-responding-to-feedback/
> is still mostly relevant.
> 

Noted as well.
Thanks!

> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 7:23 AM torvic9 via Clang Built Linux
> <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>
>> In accordance with the FIXME comment in arch/x86/Makefile, move the
>> CPU-specific 64-bit tuning settings to arch/x86/Makefile.cpu.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tor Vic <torvic9@mailbox.org>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/Makefile     | 11 ++---------
>>  arch/x86/Makefile.cpu | 12 ++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/Makefile.cpu
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile b/arch/x86/Makefile
>> index 307fd0000a83..94105d7ad22c 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/x86/Makefile
>> @@ -119,15 +119,8 @@ else
>>         # Use -mskip-rax-setup if supported.
>>         KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mskip-rax-setup)
>>
>> -        # FIXME - should be integrated in Makefile.cpu (Makefile_32.cpu)
>> -        cflags-$(CONFIG_MK8) += $(call cc-option,-march=k8)
>> -        cflags-$(CONFIG_MPSC) += $(call cc-option,-march=nocona)
>> -
>> -        cflags-$(CONFIG_MCORE2) += \
>> -                $(call cc-option,-march=core2,$(call cc-option,-mtune=generic))
>> -       cflags-$(CONFIG_MATOM) += $(call cc-option,-march=atom) \
>> -               $(call cc-option,-mtune=atom,$(call cc-option,-mtune=generic))
>> -        cflags-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU) += $(call cc-option,-mtune=generic)
>> +        # CPU-specific tuning (64-bit).
>> +        include arch/x86/Makefile.cpu
> 
> So we have arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu, would it be more symmetrical to
> have a new arch/x86/Makefile_64.cpu (rather than Makefile.cpu)?
> 
>>          KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(cflags-y)
>>
>>          KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mno-red-zone
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile.cpu b/arch/x86/Makefile.cpu
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..fb407ae94d90
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/x86/Makefile.cpu
>> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +# CPU tuning section (64-bit) - shared with UML.
>> +# Must change only cflags-y (or [yn]), not CFLAGS! That makes a difference for UML.
>> +
>> +cflags-$(CONFIG_MK8) += $(call cc-option,-march=k8)
>> +cflags-$(CONFIG_MPSC) += $(call cc-option,-march=nocona)
>> +
>> +cflags-$(CONFIG_MCORE2) += \
>> +       $(call cc-option,-march=core2,$(call cc-option,-mtune=generic))
>> +cflags-$(CONFIG_MATOM) += $(call cc-option,-march=atom) \
>> +       $(call cc-option,-mtune=atom,$(call cc-option,-mtune=generic))
>> +cflags-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU) += $(call cc-option,-mtune=generic)
> 
> I was going to say we probably don't want to limit -mtune=genric to
> 64b only, but it seems that arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu has some
> duplication here.
> 
>  47 cflags-$(CONFIG_X86_GENERIC)  += $(call tune,generic,$(call
> tune,i686))
> 
> That probably could be hoisted back into arch/x86/Makefile before the
> CONFIG_X86_32 check, but I'm not sure about the differences between
> CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU vs CONFIG_X86_GENERIC?
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-17 18:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-17 14:23 torvic9
2021-08-17 14:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86, Makefile: Add new generic x86-64 settings v2/v3/v4 torvic9
2021-08-17 18:17   ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-08-17 18:22     ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-08-17 18:31       ` Tor Vic
2021-08-17 18:47         ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-08-17 18:36   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 19:12     ` Tor Vic
2021-08-18 15:08     ` torvic9
2021-08-18 17:59       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-18 18:28         ` Tor Vic
2021-08-18 18:43           ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-18  7:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-18  9:46     ` torvic9
2021-08-19 21:58     ` David Laight
2021-08-17 17:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, Makefile: Move the CPU-specific 64-bit tuning settings to arch/x86/Makefile.cpu Nick Desaulniers
2021-08-17 18:28   ` Tor Vic [this message]
2021-08-18  7:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-18  9:46   ` torvic9
2021-08-18 14:51 ` Masahiro Yamada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=35f9422c-4cde-af6a-d56c-500b66d6f1f0@mailbox.org \
    --to=torvic9@mailbox.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86, Makefile: Move the CPU-specific 64-bit tuning settings to arch/x86/Makefile.cpu' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).