LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John Public" <>
Subject: Who's responsible for dpt_i2o in 2.6?
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 17:58:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FC63B52.21999.6C3E856@localhost> (raw)

I've been trying to compile 2.6 for my Adaptec IDE-RAID 2400A for a 
while with no luck. After reading a couple of bug reports and such I 
signed up on Adaptec's forum and found out that the supposed 
maintainer, Mark Salyzyn, states
"Incorporation into the tree can not be performed as no one is 
designated as the gatekeeper."

I'm not sure if he means gatekeeper out of Adaptec or gatekeeper
into the kernel but if it's the latter could someone tell him who
to send the patches to.


  Peder Hedlund

             reply	other threads:[~2003-11-27 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-27 16:58 John Public [this message]
2003-11-27 18:02 ` Francois Romieu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3FC63B52.21999.6C3E856@localhost \ \ \
    --subject='Re: Who'\''s responsible for dpt_i2o in 2.6?' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).