From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264553AbTK0Q7I (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2003 11:59:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264557AbTK0Q7I (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2003 11:59:08 -0500 Received: from park1.park.se ([192.121.39.1]:25791 "EHLO tux.park.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264553AbTK0Q7C (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2003 11:59:02 -0500 From: "John Public" Organization: Parkskolan To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 17:58:36 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Who's responsible for dpt_i2o in 2.6? Message-ID: <3FC63B52.21999.6C3E856@localhost> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.12a) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I've been trying to compile 2.6 for my Adaptec IDE-RAID 2400A for a while with no luck. After reading a couple of bug reports and such I signed up on Adaptec's forum and found out that the supposed maintainer, Mark Salyzyn, states "Incorporation into the tree can not be performed as no one is designated as the gatekeeper." See http://mbserver.adaptec.com/view.php?site=linux&bn=linux_raid&key= 1069782519&first=1069952140&last=1059760128 I'm not sure if he means gatekeeper out of Adaptec or gatekeeper into the kernel but if it's the latter could someone tell him who to send the patches to. Regards, Peder Hedlund