LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Guillaume Chazarain" <>
Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <>,
	LKML <>,
	"john stultz" <>,
	"Andrew Morton" <>,
	"Adrian Bunk" <>, "Ingo Molnar" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: Prevent early access to TSC to avoid crash on TSCless systems
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:30:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1174773769.10840.450.camel@localhost.localdomain>

> +static int tsc_enabled;

So, now we have tsc_disable, tsc_enabled and tsc_unstable.
I can understand the latter, but this lacks orthogonality IMHO.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-03-24 22:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-24 22:02 Thomas Gleixner
2007-03-24 22:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-24 22:30 ` Guillaume Chazarain [this message]
2007-03-24 22:32   ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] i386: Prevent early access to TSC to avoid crash on TSCless systems' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).