LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH] remove comx drivers from tree
       [not found] <20040507111725.GA11575@lst.de>
@ 2004-05-14 17:32 ` Jeff Garzik
  2004-05-15 21:41   ` Krzysztof Halasa
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2004-05-14 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: netdev, Linux Kernel, Andrew Morton, Krzysztof Halasa, Pete Popov

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> the drivers have been broken since pre-2.4.0, like referencing a symbol
> that was made procfs-internal in 2.3.x, haven't received maintainer
> updates for about the same period and MOD_{INC,DEC}_USE_COUNT usage that
> pretty much unfixable (inside warts of _horrible_ procfs abuse).
> 
> I'd say just kill them.

I have applied this to my netdev-2.6 tree, and so it should show up in 
-mm sometime.

  drivers/net/wan/Kconfig           |  113 -
  drivers/net/wan/Makefile          |    8
  drivers/net/wan/comx-hw-comx.c    | 1449 -------------------
  drivers/net/wan/comx-hw-locomx.c  |  495 ------
  drivers/net/wan/comx-hw-mixcom.c  |  959 ------------
  drivers/net/wan/comx-hw-munich.c  | 2853 
--------------------------------------
  drivers/net/wan/comx-proto-fr.c   | 1013 -------------
  drivers/net/wan/comx-proto-lapb.c |  550 -------
  drivers/net/wan/comx-proto-ppp.c  |  268 ---
  drivers/net/wan/comx.c            | 1127 ---------------
  drivers/net/wan/comx.h            |  231 ---
  drivers/net/wan/comxhw.h          |  112 -
  12 files changed, 9178 deletions(-)

Even though it is quite moldy, I want to give people some time to object 
before I remove it upstream.


BTW, I plan to remove rcpci driver at the suggestion of Pete Popov, as 
well.  It seems it's another "hasn't really worked since late 2.3.x 
days" driver, and nobody really has the hardware from this defunct 
company anymore, apparently.

	Jeff




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] remove comx drivers from tree
  2004-05-14 17:32 ` [PATCH] remove comx drivers from tree Jeff Garzik
@ 2004-05-15 21:41   ` Krzysztof Halasa
  2004-05-16 21:54     ` Jeff Garzik
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Halasa @ 2004-05-15 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff Garzik
  Cc: Christoph Hellwig, netdev, Linux Kernel, Andrew Morton, Pete Popov

Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> writes:

> I have applied this to my netdev-2.6 tree, and so it should show up in
> -mm sometime.
>
>   drivers/net/wan/Kconfig           |  113 -
>   drivers/net/wan/Makefile          |    8
>   drivers/net/wan/comx-hw-comx.c    | 1449 -------------------
>   drivers/net/wan/comx-hw-locomx.c  |  495 ------
>   drivers/net/wan/comx-hw-mixcom.c  |  959 ------------
>   drivers/net/wan/comx-hw-munich.c  | 2853
>   --------------------------------------
>   drivers/net/wan/comx-proto-fr.c   | 1013 -------------
>   drivers/net/wan/comx-proto-lapb.c |  550 -------
>   drivers/net/wan/comx-proto-ppp.c  |  268 ---
>   drivers/net/wan/comx.c            | 1127 ---------------
>   drivers/net/wan/comx.h            |  231 ---
>   drivers/net/wan/comxhw.h          |  112 -

While obviously I don't object (we should list removed things along
with kernel version somewhere, though)... I could possibly port
the drivers to my generic HDLC code, if someone sends me the hardware
in question. Sure, I will never send it back, and it has to have V.35
or V.24 interface, so I can connect it to something.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa, B*FH

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] remove comx drivers from tree
  2004-05-15 21:41   ` Krzysztof Halasa
@ 2004-05-16 21:54     ` Jeff Garzik
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2004-05-16 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Krzysztof Halasa
  Cc: Christoph Hellwig, netdev, Linux Kernel, Andrew Morton, Pete Popov

Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> While obviously I don't object (we should list removed things along
> with kernel version somewhere, though)... I could possibly port
> the drivers to my generic HDLC code, if someone sends me the hardware
> in question. Sure, I will never send it back, and it has to have V.35
> or V.24 interface, so I can connect it to something.

Then, *bang*, it's gone :)

We can resurrect if someone appears with hardware, and cares enough to 
bring the driver back to life...  Older kernels are archived on the 
Internet forever, after all :)

	Jeff




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-05-16 21:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20040507111725.GA11575@lst.de>
2004-05-14 17:32 ` [PATCH] remove comx drivers from tree Jeff Garzik
2004-05-15 21:41   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2004-05-16 21:54     ` Jeff Garzik

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).