LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <>
To: James Bottomley <>
Cc: Andrew Morton <>,
	Linux Kernel <>,
	"Randy.Dunlap" <>
Subject: Re: [patch] kill off PC9800
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 13:15:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1084743514.10765.22.camel@mulgrave>

James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-05-16 at 16:28, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>Although I like deleting things as much as the next guy :) I do have a 
>>question, to which I haven't come up with a good answer myself:
>>Should PC9800 be excised en masse, or just toss the obviously broken or 
>>not-in-any-makefile/Kconfig pieces?
>>The PC9800 net driver stuff still seems to build, and be sane.
> I haven't looked at the net stuff but if it's like the SCSI stuff, it's
> only usable in a pc9800.  The vanilla kernel currently has no way to
> select a pc9800 subarchitecture build.
> This is a test of interest.  Since the pc9800 can't build the vanilla
> kernel, is anyone maintaining the out of tree pieces to allow it to
> build, and would they take on the job of maintaining it in-tree? if
> no-one's interested in maintaining the pc9800 subarchitecture
> components, it stands to reason that no-one is going to be compiling or
> running the net or scsi drivers, so there's no point keeping them
> hanging around.  Thus, if one piece goes, they all should.

Yeah, I suppose I agree, though I dislike removing it en masse for some 
reason.  No real technical reason, more just gut feeling...  The PC9800 
people spent a good long while working with Alan and others to get what 
little bits got merged into the kernel.

I suppose disappearing and not maintaining the code is the overriding 
factor here...


  reply	other threads:[~2004-05-17 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-16 17:50 James Bottomley
2004-05-16 21:21 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-16 21:28   ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-16 21:38     ` James Bottomley
2004-05-17 17:15       ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2004-05-18 20:14   ` Matt Mackall
2004-05-18 20:23     ` Brian Gerst
2004-05-18 20:53       ` Matt Mackall
2004-05-18 21:14         ` James Bottomley
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-16  7:35 Norman Diamond
2004-05-16 16:36 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-05-17 21:38   ` Norman Diamond
2004-05-17 21:51     ` Roland Dreier
2004-05-17 21:59       ` Norman Diamond
2004-05-17 22:33         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-05-18  1:04         ` viro
2004-05-17 22:17       ` Joel Jaeggli
2004-05-16  6:21 Randy.Dunlap
2004-05-16  6:28 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-16 16:16   ` GOTO Masanori
2004-05-16 17:25     ` Randy.Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [patch] kill off PC9800' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).