LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Ryan Earl" <heretic@clanhk.org>
To: Jan De Luyck <lkml@kcore.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.6] eepro100 vs e100?
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 06:19:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40AB42D4.5010704@clanhk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200405190858.44632.lkml@kcore.org>

I've always had good results with the e100 driver:

Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Driver - version 2.3.36-k1
Copyright (c) 2003 Intel Corporation

e100: selftest OK.
e100: eth1: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Connection
  Hardware receive checksums enabled
  cpu cycle saver enabled

Jan De Luyck wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Hello List,
>
>I'm currently in the process of cleaning up my 2.6 kernel configuration on my 
>trusty SMP HP Netserver LC3, which comes shipped with 2 identical intel Pro 
>Ethernet 100 mbit cards:
>
>0000:00:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100] 
>(rev 05)
>        Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company NetServer 10/100TX
>        Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 66, IRQ 16
>        Memory at fecfd000 (32-bit, prefetchable)
>        I/O ports at fcc0 [size=32]
>        Memory at fed00000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1M]
>        Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 1
>
>I'm wondering what driver is the "best" one to use? Judging by the comments in 
>the files, the e100 driver seems to be the best maintained, though I'm 
>probably wrong ;p
>
>The website that is referenced in the eepro100 driver is no longer available 
>(returns a 404).
>
>If someone can shed some light on this, thanks!
>
>Jan
>- -- 
>Sanity is the trademark of a weak mind.
>		-- Mark Harrold
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
>
>iD8DBQFAqwWhUQQOfidJUwQRAt7wAJ9H/wapw68XfrYHgV44tf4MfqIUeACdFBvF
>R4Aupx+q9AlCKEWjtAE2v2c=
>=jQHj
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>  
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-05-19 11:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-19  6:58 Jan De Luyck
2004-05-19  7:11 ` Danny ter Haar
2004-05-19 11:12 ` Meelis Roos
2004-05-19 11:19 ` J. Ryan Earl [this message]
2004-05-19 15:46 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-05-19 22:48 ` Darren Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40AB42D4.5010704@clanhk.org \
    --to=heretic@clanhk.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkml@kcore.org \
    --subject='Re: [2.6.6] eepro100 vs e100?' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).