From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264889AbUEVGM3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 May 2004 02:12:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264890AbUEVGM3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 May 2004 02:12:29 -0400 Received: from smtp805.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([66.163.168.184]:11631 "HELO smtp805.mail.sc5.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S264889AbUEVGM2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 May 2004 02:12:28 -0400 Message-ID: <40AEEF48.1020105@sbcglobal.net> Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 01:12:24 -0500 From: Steve Dover User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6a) Gecko/20031029 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: Horst von Brand , Timothy Miller , miller@techsource.com Subject: Re: [OT] Linux stability despite unstable hardware References: <200405220443.i4M4hh631517@pincoya.inf.utfsm.cl> In-Reply-To: <200405220443.i4M4hh631517@pincoya.inf.utfsm.cl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.3.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Horst von Brand wrote: > "Timothy Miller" said: > >>I have had some issues recently with memory errors when using aggressive >>memory timings. Although memory tests pass fine, gcc would tend to crash >>and would generate incorrect code when compiling other things. Gcc couldn't >>even build itself properly under those conditions. > > > Really? memtest86 did finish its run without > errors? I'm sure they'd want to get their hands on the broken RAM... > Or these days