From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262794AbUEWM6y (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 May 2004 08:58:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262802AbUEWM6y (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 May 2004 08:58:54 -0400 Received: from 216-54-166-5.gen.twtelecom.net ([216.54.166.5]:42651 "EHLO texas.encore.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262794AbUEWM6w (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 May 2004 08:58:52 -0400 Message-ID: <40B0A007.544FFC23@compro.net> Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 08:58:47 -0400 From: Mark Hounschell Reply-To: markh@compro.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.20-ert i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: mlockall and mmap of IO devices don't mix References: <20031003214411.GA25802@rudolph.ccur.com> <40ADE959.822F1C23@compro.net> <20040521191326.58100086.akpm@osdl.org> <40AF2FC4.911DB14B@compro.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mark Hounschell wrote: > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Mark Hounschell wrote: > > > > > > Joe Korty wrote: > > > > > > > > 2.6.0-test6: the use of mlockall(2) in a process that has mmap(2)ed > > > > the registers of an IO device will hang that process uninterruptibly. > > > > The task runs in an infinite loop in get_user_pages(), invoking > > > > follow_page() forever. > > > > > > > > Using binary search I discovered that the problem was introduced > > > > in 2.5.14, specifically in ChangeSetKey > > > > > > > > zippel@linux-m68k.org|ChangeSet|20020503210330|37095 > > > > > > > > > > I know this is an old thread but can anyone tell me if this problem is > > > resolved in the current 2.6.6 kernel? > > > > > > > There's an utterly ancient patch in -mm which might fix this. > > > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.6/2.6.6-mm4/broken-out/get_user_pages-handle-VM_IO.patch > > Thanks for that. I'll try it. > > Mark Thank you. That definatly fixed my problem. Is fixing this main line WIP? Regards Mark