LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Brett E." <brettspamacct@fastclick.com> To: Andrew Theurer <habanero@us.ibm.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>, "Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos@serpentine.com>, "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: How can I optimize a process on a NUMA architecture(x86-64 specifically)? Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 18:09:12 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <40B29CB8.6040105@fastclick.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <200405241700.57249.habanero@us.ibm.com> Andrew Theurer wrote: > On Sunday 23 May 2004 09:28, Andi Kleen wrote: > >>On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 05:28:09PM -0700, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 16:42, Brett E. wrote: >>> >>>>Right now, 5 processes are running taking up a good deal of the CPU >>>>doing memory-intensive work(cacheing) and I notice that none of the >>>>processes seem to have CPU affinity. >>> >>>I don't know what kind of system you're running on, but if it's a >>>multi-CPU Opteron, it is normally a sufficient fudge to just use >>>sched_setaffinity to bind individual processes to specific CPUs. The >>>mainline kernel memory allocator does the right thing in that case, and >>>allocates memory locally when it can. >>> >>>You can use the taskset command to get at this from the command line, so >>>you may not even need to modify your code. >> >>Linus also merged the NUMA API support into mainline now with 2.6.7rc1, so >>you can use numactl for more finegrained tuning. > > > FYI Brett, some Opteron systems have a BIOS option to interleave memory. If > you are going to make use of NUMA, I think you want to not interleave. Thanks for the heads up, I just disabled interleaving in the BIOS. > > Also, if you have a 25% imbalance within a domain/node, the scheduler can have > a tendency to bounce around a task for fairness. That might be why you are > seeing little/no affinity to a cpu (even top might be causing some of this). > Not sure what the threshold is between domains/nodes, but I am curious if it > still happens with CONFIG_NUMA on. If these are long lived cpu bound > processes, I would try to have the number of processes be a multiple of the > number of cpus. I have CONFIG_NUMA on and yes these are long-lived processes(duration is 1 hour). And you and I are on the same wavelength, I'm imagining 3 processes per CPU with apache handing off work to the processes in question. This is on a 1.6ghz 2-way opteron if that matters at all. Hopefully I can make the modifications and test this tomorrow. Thanks, Brett
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-25 1:10 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <1Y6yr-eM-11@gated-at.bofh.it> [not found] ` <1YbRm-4iF-11@gated-at.bofh.it> [not found] ` <1Yma3-4cF-3@gated-at.bofh.it> [not found] ` <1YmjP-4jX-37@gated-at.bofh.it> 2004-05-21 19:17 ` How can I optimize a process on a NUMA architecture(x86-64 specifically)? Andi Kleen [not found] ` <1YmMN-4Kh-17@gated-at.bofh.it> [not found] ` <1Yn67-50q-7@gated-at.bofh.it> 2004-05-21 19:19 ` Andi Kleen 2004-05-21 20:32 ` Martin J. Bligh 2004-05-21 23:42 ` Brett E. 2004-05-22 6:13 ` Martin J. Bligh 2004-05-22 7:41 ` Andi Kleen 2004-05-23 0:28 ` Bryan O'Sullivan 2004-05-23 14:28 ` Andi Kleen 2004-05-24 22:00 ` Andrew Theurer 2004-05-25 0:27 ` Scott Robert Ladd 2004-05-25 1:09 ` Brett E. [this message] [not found] ` <1YRnC-3vk-5@gated-at.bofh.it> 2004-05-23 11:57 ` Andi Kleen 2004-05-21 0:51 Brett E. 2004-05-21 1:29 ` Jesse Barnes 2004-05-21 6:37 ` Martin J. Bligh 2004-05-21 17:27 ` Brett E. 2004-05-21 17:46 ` Martin J. Bligh 2004-05-21 18:14 ` Brett E. 2004-05-21 18:30 ` Martin J. Bligh 2004-05-21 18:58 ` Jesse Barnes 2004-05-21 19:08 ` Martin J. Bligh 2004-05-23 2:49 ` David Schwartz
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=40B29CB8.6040105@fastclick.com \ --to=brettspamacct@fastclick.com \ --cc=ak@muc.de \ --cc=bos@serpentine.com \ --cc=habanero@us.ibm.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).