LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@synopsys.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>,
Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@synopsys.com>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: Prevent indefinite sleep in _dwc3_set_mode during suspend/resume
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 06:29:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <410670D7E743164D87FA6160E7907A560113AE789A@am04wembxb.internal.synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 410670D7E743164D87FA6160E7907A560113ABCA0A@am04wembxa.internal.synopsys.com
Hi Filipe,
On 3/19/2018 5:53 PM, Minas Harutyunyan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3/19/2018 3:36 PM, Minas Harutyunyan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 3/19/2018 12:55 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@synopsys.com> writes:
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for picking this for -next.
>>>>>>>>> Is it better to have this in v4.16-rc fixes?
>>>>>>>>> and also stable? v4.12+
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, there was no "Fixes: foobar" or "Cc: stable" lines in the commit
>>>>>>>> log ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The best we can do now, is wait for -rc1 and manually send the commit to
>>>>>>>> stable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's fine. Thanks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Same issue seen in dwc3_gadget_ep_dequeue() function where also used
>>>>>> wait_event_lock_irq() - as result infinite loop.
>>>>>
>>>>> how did this happen? During rmmod dwc3? Or, perhaps, after you unloaded
>>>>> a gadget driver?
>>>>>
>>>> No, not during rmmod's.
>>>> We using our internal USB testing tool. Test case; ISOC OUT, transfer
>>>> size N frames. When host starts ISOC OUT traffic then the dwc3 based on
>>>> "Transfer not ready" event in frame F starts transfers staring from
>>>> frame F+4 (for bInterval=1) as result 4 requests, which already queued
>>>> on device side, remain incomplete. Function driver on some timeout
>>>> trying dequeue these 4 requests (without disabling EP) to complete test.
>>>> For IN ISOC's these requests completed on MISSED ISOC event, but for
>>>> ISOC OUT required call dequeue on some timeout.
>>>
>>> okay
>>>
>>>>>> Actually to fix this issue I updated condition of wait function
>>>>>> from:
>>>>>> !(dep->flags & DWC3_EP_END_TRANSFER_PENDING)
>>>>>> to:
>>>>>> !(dep->flags & DWC3_EP_END_TRANSFER_PENDING & DWC3_EP_ENABLED)
>>>>>
>>>>> you're not fixing anything. You're, essentially, removing the entire
>>>>> end transfer pending logic.
>>>> yes, you are right, but how to overcome this infinite loop? Replace
>>>> wait_event_lock_irq() by wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout()?
>>>
>>> The best way here would be to figure why we're missing command complete
>>> IRQ in those cases. According to documentation, we *should* receive that
>>> interrupt, so why is it missing?
>>>
>>
>> Additional info on test. Core configuration is HS only mode, test speed
>> HS, core version v2.90a. Maybe it will help to understand cause of issue.
>> BTW, currently to pass above describe ISOC OUT test we just commented
>> wait_event_lock_irq() in dwc3_gadget_ep_dequeue() function and
>> successfully received request completion in function driver.
>> Thanks,
>> Minas
>>
>
> One more info: while function driver call dequeue, host periodically
> send control read command to get status of test from function - test In
> Progress or Finished.
> Thanks,
> Minas
>
Your last dwc3 patch series allow us to successfully dequeuing remaining
requests without falling in to infinite loop.
Thank you,
Minas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-10 6:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-27 11:22 [PATCH] usb: dwc3: Prevent indefinite sleep in _dwc3_set_mode during suspend/resume Roger Quadros
2018-02-28 3:04 ` Baolin Wang
2018-02-28 9:55 ` Roger Quadros
2018-02-28 7:53 ` Felipe Balbi
2018-02-28 9:59 ` Roger Quadros
2018-03-05 8:49 ` Felipe Balbi
2018-03-05 9:45 ` Roger Quadros
2018-03-05 10:41 ` Baolin Wang
2018-03-05 11:03 ` Roger Quadros
2018-03-05 11:06 ` Felipe Balbi
2018-03-05 11:14 ` Roger Quadros
2018-03-05 11:25 ` Baolin Wang
2018-03-05 11:27 ` Felipe Balbi
2018-03-09 9:19 ` Roger Quadros
2018-03-09 9:23 ` Felipe Balbi
2018-03-09 9:26 ` Roger Quadros
2018-03-09 9:49 ` Roger Quadros
2018-03-09 10:39 ` Felipe Balbi
2018-03-09 10:36 ` Felipe Balbi
2018-03-05 11:25 ` Felipe Balbi
2018-03-09 12:47 ` [PATCH v2] " Roger Quadros
2018-03-16 10:34 ` Roger Quadros
2018-03-16 11:00 ` Felipe Balbi
2018-03-16 11:03 ` Roger Quadros
2018-03-16 11:43 ` Minas Harutyunyan
2018-03-16 12:25 ` Felipe Balbi
2018-03-17 6:33 ` Minas Harutyunyan
2018-03-19 8:54 ` Felipe Balbi
2018-03-19 11:36 ` Minas Harutyunyan
2018-03-19 13:53 ` Minas Harutyunyan
2018-04-10 6:29 ` Minas Harutyunyan [this message]
2018-04-10 7:31 ` Felipe Balbi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=410670D7E743164D87FA6160E7907A560113AE789A@am04wembxb.internal.synopsys.com \
--to=minas.harutyunyan@synopsys.com \
--cc=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rogerq@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).