LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: Add lradc node
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 10:35:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4343071.IDWclfcoxo@g550jk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190521142544.ma2xfu77bamk4hvc@flea>
On Dienstag, 21. Mai 2019 16:25:44 CEST Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 03:52:47PM +0200, luca@z3ntu.xyz wrote:
> > On May 21, 2019 3:09:55 PM GMT+02:00, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > >On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 08:43:45AM +0200, luca@z3ntu.xyz wrote:
> > >> On May 20, 2019 1:07:42 PM GMT+02:00, Maxime Ripard
> > >
> > ><maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > >> >On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 07:09:30PM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > >> >> Add a node describing the KEYADC on the A64.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
> > >> >> ---
> > >> >>
> > >> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 7 +++++++
> > >> >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > >> >>
> > >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> > >> >
> > >> >b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> > >> >
> > >> >> index 7734f70e1057..dc1bf8c1afb5 100644
> > >> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> > >> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> > >> >> @@ -704,6 +704,13 @@
> > >> >>
> > >> >> status = "disabled";
> > >> >>
> > >> >> };
> > >> >>
> > >> >> + lradc: lradc@1c21800 {
> > >> >> + compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-lradc-
keys";
> > >> >> + reg = <0x01c21800 0x100>;
> > >> >> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 30
IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > >> >> + status = "disabled";
> > >> >> + };
> > >> >> +
> > >> >
> > >> >The controller is pretty different on the A64 compared to the A10.
> > >
> > >The
> > >
> > >> >A10 has two channels for example, while the A64 has only one.
> > >> >
> > >> >It looks like the one in the A83t though, so you can use that
> > >> >compatible instead.
> > >>
> > >> Looking at the patch for the A83t, the only difference is that it
> > >> uses a 3/4 instead of a 2/3 voltage divider, nothing is changed with
> > >> the channels.
> > >
> > >I guess you can reuse the A83t compatible here then, and a more
> > >specific a64 compatible in case we ever need to fix this.
> > >
> > >> But I'm also not sure which one (or a different one)
> > >> is used from looking at the "A64 User Manual".
> > >
> > >I'm sorry, what are you referring to with "one" in that sentence?
> >
> > Sorry, I meant I didn't find anything in the A64 user manual whether
> > a 3/4 or a 2/3 voltage divider (or one with different values) is
> > used on the A64.
>
> Ok :)
>
> I guess you can just reuse the A83t compatible then, together with the
> A64's.
>
> Maxime
>
> --
> Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
Hi Maxime,
I'd submit a v2 with these changes to v1 then:
lradc: lradc@1c21800 {
- compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-lradc-keys";
- reg = <0x01c21800 0x100>;
+ compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-lradc-keys",
+ "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-r-lradc";
+ reg = <0x01c21800 0x400>;
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 30 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
status = "disabled";
};
Does that look okay?
The reg change is due to me not spotting the address being 0x01C2
1800---0x01C2 1BFF, so the size should be 0x400 and not 0x100.
Thanks for the feedback,
Luca
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-24 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-18 17:09 Luca Weiss
2019-05-20 11:07 ` Maxime Ripard
2019-05-21 6:43 ` luca
2019-05-21 13:09 ` Maxime Ripard
2019-05-21 13:52 ` luca
2019-05-21 14:25 ` Maxime Ripard
2019-05-24 8:35 ` Luca Weiss [this message]
2019-05-24 9:20 ` Maxime Ripard
2019-05-31 10:27 ` Luca Weiss
2019-06-03 7:42 ` Maxime Ripard
2019-06-03 15:20 ` Luca Weiss
2019-06-04 8:28 ` Maxime Ripard
2019-06-04 14:42 Luca Weiss
2019-06-04 14:59 ` Maxime Ripard
2019-06-04 15:07 ` Luca Weiss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4343071.IDWclfcoxo@g550jk \
--to=luca@z3ntu.xyz \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maxime.ripard@bootlin.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: Add lradc node' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).