LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: neilb@suse.de, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, christopher.leech@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/19] iop3xx: Give Linux control over PCI (ATU) initialization
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:56:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4505F79E.6070302@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060911231910.4737.16639.stgit@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com>
Dan Williams wrote:
> From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>
> Currently the iop3xx platform support code assumes that RedBoot is the
> bootloader and has already initialized the ATU. Linux should handle this
> initialization for three reasons:
>
> 1/ The memory map that RedBoot sets up is not optimal (page_to_dma and
> virt_to_phys return different addresses). The effect of this is that using
> the dma mapping API for the internal bus dma units generates pci bus
> addresses that are incorrect for the internal bus.
>
> 2/ Not all iop platforms use RedBoot
>
> 3/ If the ATU is already initialized it indicates that the iop is an add-in
> card in another host, it does not own the PCI bus, and should not be
> re-initialized.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
>
> arch/arm/mach-iop32x/Kconfig | 8 ++
> arch/arm/mach-iop32x/ep80219.c | 4 +
> arch/arm/mach-iop32x/iq31244.c | 5 +
> arch/arm/mach-iop32x/iq80321.c | 5 +
> arch/arm/mach-iop33x/Kconfig | 8 ++
> arch/arm/mach-iop33x/iq80331.c | 5 +
> arch/arm/mach-iop33x/iq80332.c | 4 +
> arch/arm/plat-iop/pci.c | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/asm-arm/arch-iop32x/iop32x.h | 9 ++
> include/asm-arm/arch-iop32x/memory.h | 4 -
> include/asm-arm/arch-iop33x/iop33x.h | 10 ++
> include/asm-arm/arch-iop33x/memory.h | 4 -
> include/asm-arm/hardware/iop3xx.h | 20 ++++-
> 13 files changed, 214 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-iop32x/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-iop32x/Kconfig
> index 05549a5..b2788e3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-iop32x/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-iop32x/Kconfig
> @@ -22,6 +22,14 @@ config ARCH_IQ80321
> Say Y here if you want to run your kernel on the Intel IQ80321
> evaluation kit for the IOP321 processor.
>
> +config IOP3XX_ATU
> + bool "Enable the PCI Controller"
> + default y
> + help
> + Say Y here if you want the IOP to initialize its PCI Controller.
> + Say N if the IOP is an add in card, the host system owns the PCI
> + bus in this case.
> +
> endmenu
>
> endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-iop32x/ep80219.c b/arch/arm/mach-iop32x/ep80219.c
> index f616d3e..1a5c586 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-iop32x/ep80219.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-iop32x/ep80219.c
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ ep80219_pci_map_irq(struct pci_dev *dev,
>
> static struct hw_pci ep80219_pci __initdata = {
> .swizzle = pci_std_swizzle,
> - .nr_controllers = 1,
> + .nr_controllers = 0,
> .setup = iop3xx_pci_setup,
> .preinit = iop3xx_pci_preinit,
> .scan = iop3xx_pci_scan_bus,
> @@ -109,6 +109,8 @@ static struct hw_pci ep80219_pci __initd
>
> static int __init ep80219_pci_init(void)
> {
> + if (iop3xx_get_init_atu() == IOP3XX_INIT_ATU_ENABLE)
> + ep80219_pci.nr_controllers = 1;
> #if 0
> if (machine_is_ep80219())
> pci_common_init(&ep80219_pci);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-iop32x/iq31244.c b/arch/arm/mach-iop32x/iq31244.c
> index 967a696..25d5d62 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-iop32x/iq31244.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-iop32x/iq31244.c
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ iq31244_pci_map_irq(struct pci_dev *dev,
>
> static struct hw_pci iq31244_pci __initdata = {
> .swizzle = pci_std_swizzle,
> - .nr_controllers = 1,
> + .nr_controllers = 0,
> .setup = iop3xx_pci_setup,
> .preinit = iop3xx_pci_preinit,
> .scan = iop3xx_pci_scan_bus,
> @@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ static struct hw_pci iq31244_pci __initd
>
> static int __init iq31244_pci_init(void)
> {
> + if (iop3xx_get_init_atu() == IOP3XX_INIT_ATU_ENABLE)
> + iq31244_pci.nr_controllers = 1;
> +
> if (machine_is_iq31244())
> pci_common_init(&iq31244_pci);
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-iop32x/iq80321.c b/arch/arm/mach-iop32x/iq80321.c
> index ef4388c..cdd2265 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-iop32x/iq80321.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-iop32x/iq80321.c
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ iq80321_pci_map_irq(struct pci_dev *dev,
>
> static struct hw_pci iq80321_pci __initdata = {
> .swizzle = pci_std_swizzle,
> - .nr_controllers = 1,
> + .nr_controllers = 0,
> .setup = iop3xx_pci_setup,
> .preinit = iop3xx_pci_preinit,
> .scan = iop3xx_pci_scan_bus,
> @@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ static struct hw_pci iq80321_pci __initd
>
> static int __init iq80321_pci_init(void)
> {
> + if (iop3xx_get_init_atu() == IOP3XX_INIT_ATU_ENABLE)
> + iq80321_pci.nr_controllers = 1;
> +
> if (machine_is_iq80321())
> pci_common_init(&iq80321_pci);
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-iop33x/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-iop33x/Kconfig
> index 9aa016b..45598e0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-iop33x/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-iop33x/Kconfig
> @@ -16,6 +16,14 @@ config MACH_IQ80332
> Say Y here if you want to run your kernel on the Intel IQ80332
> evaluation kit for the IOP332 chipset.
>
> +config IOP3XX_ATU
> + bool "Enable the PCI Controller"
> + default y
> + help
> + Say Y here if you want the IOP to initialize its PCI Controller.
> + Say N if the IOP is an add in card, the host system owns the PCI
> + bus in this case.
> +
> endmenu
>
> endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-iop33x/iq80331.c b/arch/arm/mach-iop33x/iq80331.c
> index 7714c94..3807000 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-iop33x/iq80331.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-iop33x/iq80331.c
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ iq80331_pci_map_irq(struct pci_dev *dev,
>
> static struct hw_pci iq80331_pci __initdata = {
> .swizzle = pci_std_swizzle,
> - .nr_controllers = 1,
> + .nr_controllers = 0,
> .setup = iop3xx_pci_setup,
> .preinit = iop3xx_pci_preinit,
> .scan = iop3xx_pci_scan_bus,
> @@ -87,6 +87,9 @@ static struct hw_pci iq80331_pci __initd
>
> static int __init iq80331_pci_init(void)
> {
> + if (iop3xx_get_init_atu() == IOP3XX_INIT_ATU_ENABLE)
> + iq80331_pci.nr_controllers = 1;
> +
> if (machine_is_iq80331())
> pci_common_init(&iq80331_pci);
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-iop33x/iq80332.c b/arch/arm/mach-iop33x/iq80332.c
> index a3fa7f8..8780d55 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-iop33x/iq80332.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-iop33x/iq80332.c
> @@ -93,6 +93,10 @@ static struct hw_pci iq80332_pci __initd
>
> static int __init iq80332_pci_init(void)
> {
> +
> + if (iop3xx_get_init_atu() == IOP3XX_INIT_ATU_ENABLE)
> + iq80332_pci.nr_controllers = 1;
> +
> if (machine_is_iq80332())
> pci_common_init(&iq80332_pci);
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-iop/pci.c b/arch/arm/plat-iop/pci.c
> index e647812..19aace9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-iop/pci.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-iop/pci.c
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static u32 iop3xx_cfg_address(struct pci
> * This routine checks the status of the last configuration cycle. If an error
> * was detected it returns a 1, else it returns a 0. The errors being checked
> * are parity, master abort, target abort (master and target). These types of
> - * errors occure during a config cycle where there is no device, like during
> + * errors occur during a config cycle where there is no device, like during
> * the discovery stage.
> */
> static int iop3xx_pci_status(void)
> @@ -223,8 +223,111 @@ struct pci_bus *iop3xx_pci_scan_bus(int
> return pci_scan_bus(sys->busnr, &iop3xx_ops, sys);
> }
>
> +void __init iop3xx_atu_setup(void)
> +{
> + /* BAR 0 ( Disabled ) */
> + *IOP3XX_IAUBAR0 = 0x0;
> + *IOP3XX_IABAR0 = 0x0;
> + *IOP3XX_IATVR0 = 0x0;
> + *IOP3XX_IALR0 = 0x0;
> +
> + /* BAR 1 ( Disabled ) */
> + *IOP3XX_IAUBAR1 = 0x0;
> + *IOP3XX_IABAR1 = 0x0;
> + *IOP3XX_IALR1 = 0x0;
> +
> + /* BAR 2 (1:1 mapping with Physical RAM) */
> + /* Set limit and enable */
> + *IOP3XX_IALR2 = ~((u32)IOP3XX_MAX_RAM_SIZE - 1) & ~0x1;
> + *IOP3XX_IAUBAR2 = 0x0;
> +
> + /* Align the inbound bar with the base of memory */
> + *IOP3XX_IABAR2 = PHYS_OFFSET |
> + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 |
> + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_PREFETCH;
> +
> + *IOP3XX_IATVR2 = PHYS_OFFSET;
> +
> + /* Outbound window 0 */
> + *IOP3XX_OMWTVR0 = IOP3XX_PCI_LOWER_MEM_PA;
> + *IOP3XX_OUMWTVR0 = 0;
> +
> + /* Outbound window 1 */
> + *IOP3XX_OMWTVR1 = IOP3XX_PCI_LOWER_MEM_PA + IOP3XX_PCI_MEM_WINDOW_SIZE;
> + *IOP3XX_OUMWTVR1 = 0;
> +
> + /* BAR 3 ( Disabled ) */
> + *IOP3XX_IAUBAR3 = 0x0;
> + *IOP3XX_IABAR3 = 0x0;
> + *IOP3XX_IATVR3 = 0x0;
> + *IOP3XX_IALR3 = 0x0;
> +
> + /* Setup the I/O Bar
> + */
> + *IOP3XX_OIOWTVR = IOP3XX_PCI_LOWER_IO_PA;;
> +
> + /* Enable inbound and outbound cycles
> + */
> + *IOP3XX_ATUCMD |= PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY | PCI_COMMAND_MASTER |
> + PCI_COMMAND_PARITY | PCI_COMMAND_SERR;
> + *IOP3XX_ATUCR |= IOP3XX_ATUCR_OUT_EN;
> +}
> +
> +void __init iop3xx_atu_disable(void)
> +{
> + *IOP3XX_ATUCMD = 0;
> + *IOP3XX_ATUCR = 0;
> +
> + /* wait for cycles to quiesce */
> + while (*IOP3XX_PCSR & (IOP3XX_PCSR_OUT_Q_BUSY |
> + IOP3XX_PCSR_IN_Q_BUSY))
> + cpu_relax();
> +
> + /* BAR 0 ( Disabled ) */
> + *IOP3XX_IAUBAR0 = 0x0;
> + *IOP3XX_IABAR0 = 0x0;
> + *IOP3XX_IATVR0 = 0x0;
> + *IOP3XX_IALR0 = 0x0;
> +
> + /* BAR 1 ( Disabled ) */
> + *IOP3XX_IAUBAR1 = 0x0;
> + *IOP3XX_IABAR1 = 0x0;
> + *IOP3XX_IALR1 = 0x0;
> +
> + /* BAR 2 ( Disabled ) */
> + *IOP3XX_IAUBAR2 = 0x0;
> + *IOP3XX_IABAR2 = 0x0;
> + *IOP3XX_IATVR2 = 0x0;
> + *IOP3XX_IALR2 = 0x0;
> +
> + /* BAR 3 ( Disabled ) */
> + *IOP3XX_IAUBAR3 = 0x0;
> + *IOP3XX_IABAR3 = 0x0;
> + *IOP3XX_IATVR3 = 0x0;
> + *IOP3XX_IALR3 = 0x0;
> +
> + /* Clear the outbound windows */
> + *IOP3XX_OIOWTVR = 0;
> +
> + /* Outbound window 0 */
> + *IOP3XX_OMWTVR0 = 0;
> + *IOP3XX_OUMWTVR0 = 0;
> +
> + /* Outbound window 1 */
> + *IOP3XX_OMWTVR1 = 0;
> + *IOP3XX_OUMWTVR1 = 0;
You should be using readl(), writel() variants rather than writing C
code that appears to be normal, but in reality has hardware side-effects.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-11 23:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-11 23:00 [PATCH 00/19] Hardware Accelerated MD RAID5: Introduction Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:17 ` [PATCH 01/19] raid5: raid5_do_soft_block_ops Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-11 23:17 ` [PATCH 02/19] raid5: move write operations to a workqueue Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:36 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-11 23:17 ` [PATCH 03/19] raid5: move check parity " Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:17 ` [PATCH 04/19] raid5: move compute block " Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:18 ` [PATCH 05/19] raid5: move read completion copies " Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:18 ` [PATCH 06/19] raid5: move the reconstruct write expansion operation " Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:18 ` [PATCH 07/19] raid5: remove compute_block and compute_parity5 Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:18 ` [PATCH 08/19] dmaengine: enable multiple clients and operations Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-12 0:14 ` Dan Williams
2006-09-12 0:52 ` Roland Dreier
2006-09-12 6:18 ` Dan Williams
2006-09-12 9:15 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-09-13 4:04 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-15 16:38 ` Olof Johansson
2006-09-15 19:44 ` [PATCH] dmaengine: clean up and abstract function types (was Re: [PATCH 08/19] dmaengine: enable multiple clients and operations) Olof Johansson
2006-09-15 20:02 ` [PATCH] [v2] " Olof Johansson
2006-09-18 22:56 ` [PATCH] " Dan Williams
2006-09-19 1:05 ` Olof Johansson
2006-09-19 11:20 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-19 16:32 ` Olof Johansson
2006-09-11 23:18 ` [PATCH 09/19] dmaengine: reduce backend address permutations Dan Williams
2006-09-15 14:46 ` Olof Johansson
2006-09-11 23:18 ` [PATCH 10/19] dmaengine: expose per channel dma mapping characteristics to clients Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:18 ` [PATCH 11/19] dmaengine: add memset as an asynchronous dma operation Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-11 23:18 ` [PATCH 12/19] dmaengine: dma_async_memcpy_err for DMA engines that do not support memcpy Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-11 23:18 ` [PATCH 13/19] dmaengine: add support for dma xor zero sum operations Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:18 ` [PATCH 14/19] dmaengine: add dma_sync_wait Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-11 23:18 ` [PATCH 15/19] dmaengine: raid5 dma client Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-11 23:19 ` [PATCH 16/19] dmaengine: Driver for the Intel IOP 32x, 33x, and 13xx RAID engines Dan Williams
2006-09-15 14:57 ` Olof Johansson
2006-09-11 23:19 ` [PATCH 17/19] iop3xx: define IOP3XX_REG_ADDR[32|16|8] and clean up DMA/AAU defs Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-11 23:19 ` [PATCH 18/19] iop3xx: Give Linux control over PCI (ATU) initialization Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:56 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-09-11 23:19 ` [PATCH 19/19] iop3xx: IOP 32x and 33x support for the iop-adma driver Dan Williams
2006-09-11 23:38 ` [PATCH 00/19] Hardware Accelerated MD RAID5: Introduction Jeff Garzik
2006-09-11 23:53 ` Dan Williams
2006-09-12 2:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-12 5:47 ` Dan Williams
2006-09-13 4:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-13 7:15 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-09-13 19:17 ` Dan Williams
2006-09-14 7:42 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-10-11 1:46 ` Dan Williams
2006-10-08 22:18 ` Neil Brown
2006-10-10 18:23 ` Dan Williams
2006-10-11 2:44 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4505F79E.6070302@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=christopher.leech@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 18/19] iop3xx: Give Linux control over PCI (ATU) initialization' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).