LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux should define ENOTSUP
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 07:26:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4576E134.5020109@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061206152542.GS3927@implementation.labri.fr>
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin, le Wed 06 Dec 2006 07:16:39 -0800, a écrit :
>> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>>> Is there any way to fix this? Glibc people don't seem to want to fix it
>>>> on their part, see
>>>> http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2363
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Ulrich asked you to go to us once your time travel machine was
>>> finished.. is it finished yet ? ;=)
>>>
>>> this is part of the ABI, so we can't change this in 2006...
>>>
>> If ENOTSUP is currently unused and is only there for completeness, then
>> it should be fine to add it.
>
> The functions that should be returning it instead of EOPNOTSUP should be
> fixed too.
>
The two can't be done at the same time. In fact, the two probably can't
be done without a period of quite a few *years* between them.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-06 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-06 13:51 Samuel Thibault
2006-12-06 14:25 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-12-06 14:31 ` Samuel Thibault
2006-12-06 15:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-12-06 20:10 ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-12-06 21:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-12-06 22:34 ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-12-07 13:49 ` Theodore Tso
2006-12-07 13:59 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-12-07 14:15 ` Theodore Tso
2006-12-07 14:30 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-12-07 15:33 ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-12-06 15:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-12-06 15:25 ` Samuel Thibault
2006-12-06 15:26 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2006-12-06 15:34 ` Samuel Thibault
2006-12-06 15:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-12-06 16:14 ` Samuel Thibault
2006-12-06 16:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4576E134.5020109@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
--subject='Re: Linux should define ENOTSUP' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).