LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Alan <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Proposed changes for libata speed handling
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:02:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45A83DD2.5020000@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070112135301.4cdba24f@localhost.localdomain>
Alan wrote:
> I'm currently hacking on the speed handling code a bit
>
> I'd like to do the following unless anyone has any objections
>
> - Remove post_set_mode and make drivers wrap the guts of the existing
> set_mode() function. This allows a driver to wrap and see success/failure
> while removing a callback, and also to add pre-mode code. (ie you'd do
>
> foo_set_mode() {
> ata_default_set_mode()
> my_fiddling();
> }
>
> - Fix the ->set_mode method FIXMEs in the current tree [DONE]
>
> - Add set_specific_mode, with a default behaviour that works for most
> controllers. Those using a private ->set_mode might need a private
> ->set_specific_mode, in some cases like it8212 simply to error the request
>
> - Hook set_specific_mode to the ata command parser so that instead of
> erroring set_features commands we snoop them and force the mode change
> desired on the controller (if valid)
>
> - Send the command to set the speed before setting the controller speed,
> so that we send them at the right rate.
>
> Any comments ?
Wouldn't it be better to have ->determine_xfer_mask() and
->set_specific_mode() than having two somewhat overlapping callbacks?
Or is there some problem that can't be handled that way?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-13 2:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-12 13:53 Proposed changes for libata speed handling Alan
2007-01-13 2:02 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2007-01-13 10:01 ` Alan
2007-01-15 3:09 ` Tejun Heo
2007-01-15 13:52 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45A83DD2.5020000@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).