LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: Sunil Naidu <akula2.shark@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Choosing a HyperThreading/SMP/MultiCore kernel ?
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:52:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45AA51D4.4030503@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200701140155.l0E1tpkB009184@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>

Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:18:31 EST, Bill Davidsen said:
>> Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>>> On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:03:49 EST, Lennart Sorensen said:
>>>> I would expect any distribution should work on these (as long as the
>>>> kernel they use isn't too old.).  Of course if it is a Mac, you need a
>>>> distribution that supports their firmware (which is of course not a PC
>>>> bios).  As long as you can boot it, any i386 or amd64 kernel with smp
>>>> enabled should use all the processors present (well amd64 on the
>>>> core2duo and on the p4 if it is em64t enabled).
>>> amd64 will only work on a core2duo if it's a T7200 or higher - the
>>> lower numbers are 32-bit-only chipsets.  I admit not knowing what
>>> exact variant the Mac has.
>> I don't believe that's correct, the Intel features page indicates all 
>> core2 have both 64bit and virtualization. Perhaps some of the core (no 
>> 2) models didn't? Even the old 930 had those features by my notes.
> 
> My screwup - the chart I looked at managed to get the Core and Core2 series
> mixed up. Here's a hopefully more canonical one:
> 
> http://www.intel.com/products/processor_number/proc_info_table.pdf
> 
> Does however list some Core2 that don't do virtualization (page 3, the
> T5600 and T5500), which is what I think confused the author of the table
> that I misread. ;)

I missed those in terms of virtualization, but it seems that all core2 
support "intel 64" which I assume means emt64t, and what I thought 
Valdis meant by "the lower numbers are 32-bit-only chipsets." They all 
do seem to have 64bit, and should run 64bit Linux just fine.
-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
   CTO TMR Associates, Inc
   Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979

      reply	other threads:[~2007-01-14 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-12 13:25 Sunil Naidu
2007-01-12 15:03 ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-01-12 23:21   ` Sunil Naidu
2007-01-12 23:29     ` Paul Jackson
2007-01-13  3:38   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-01-13 12:07     ` Stefan Richter
2007-01-13 17:54     ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-01-14  2:21       ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-01-20  3:45       ` Sunil Naidu
2007-01-13 20:18     ` Bill Davidsen
2007-01-14  1:55       ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-01-14 15:52         ` Bill Davidsen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45AA51D4.4030503@tmr.com \
    --to=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akula2.shark@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: Choosing a HyperThreading/SMP/MultiCore kernel ?' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).