From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964819AbXASELp (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jan 2007 23:11:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964827AbXASELp (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jan 2007 23:11:45 -0500 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:58482 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964819AbXASELo (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jan 2007 23:11:44 -0500 Message-ID: <45B044F8.1080904@goop.org> Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:11:36 +1100 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061219) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pavel Machek CC: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Pratt , Christian Limpach , Chris Wright Subject: Re: [patch 16/20] XEN-paravirt: Add the Xen virtual console driver. References: <20070113014539.408244126@goop.org> <20070113014648.767777869@goop.org> <20070115130314.GA4272@ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20070115130314.GA4272@ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pavel Machek wrote: > You have drivers/xen... so maybe arch/i386/xen is easier to type? > arch/i386/paravirt/xen would make some sense, too, but it looks too > deep to me. I think the exact placement of these files needs a bit of work. I don't much care about xen/ vs paravirt/xen vs paravirt-xen/, but placement of headers needs a bit more thought. lhype, er, lguest and vmi are in kernel/, but I think it would be nice to put them near Xen. J