LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc St-Jean <Marc_St-Jean@pmc-sierra.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial driver PMC MSP71xx, kernel linux-mips.git mast er
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:35:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45B52018.3010409@pmc-sierra.com> (raw)

CCing to linux-kernel as per AC's suggestion...

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [PATCH] serial driver PMC MSP71xx, kernel linux-mips.git
mast er
Date: 	Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:23:56 -0800
From: 	Sergei Shtylyov
Organization: 	MontaVista Software Inc.
To: 	Marc St-Jean
CC: 	<linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>
References:
<5C1FD43E5F1B824E83985A74F396286E03AD7632@bby1exm08.pmc_nt.nt.pmc-sierra.bc.ca>



Hello.

Marc St-Jean wrote:

     Your maile is strange: it line-wraps quotes but not your own text...
:-/

  >>>Here is a serial driver patch for the PMC-Sierra MSP71xx device.

  >>>There are three different fixes:
  >>>1. Fix for THRE errata
  >>>2. Fix for Busy Detect on LCR write
  >>>3. Workaround for interrupt/data concurrency issue

  >>>The first fix is handled cleanly using a UART_BUG_* flag.
  >>    Hm, I wouldn't call it clean...

  > Relative to the other two. Any recommended improvements on this one?

     I already told: runtime check.

  >>>Thanks,
  >>>Marc

  >>>Signed-off-by: Marc St-Jean <Marc_St-Jean@pmc-sierra.com>

  >>>Index: linux_2_6/drivers/serial/8250.c
  >>>===================================================================
  >>>RCS file: linux_2_6/drivers/serial/8250.c,v retrieving revision
  >>>1.1.1.7 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.1.1.7 -r1.9
  >>>--- linux_2_6/drivers/serial/8250.c  19 Oct 2006 21:00:58
  >>
  >>-0000 1.1.1.7
  >>
  >>>+++ linux_2_6/drivers/serial/8250.c  19 Oct 2006 22:08:15
  >>
  >>-0000 1.9
  >>
  >>>@@ -44,6 +44,10 @@
  >>>  #include <asm/io.h>
  >>>  #include <asm/irq.h>
  >>>
  >>>+#ifdef CONFIG_PMC_MSP
  >>>+#include <msp_regs.h>
  >>>+#endif
  >>>+
  >>>  #include "8250.h"

  >>>  /*
  >>>@@ -130,6 +134,9 @@
  >>>     unsigned char           mcr_mask;       /* mask of user bits */
  >>>     unsigned char           mcr_force;      /* mask of forced bits */

  >>>     unsigned char           lsr_break_flag;
  >>>+#ifdef CONFIG_PMC_MSP
  >>>+    int                                     dwapb_lcr;

  >>/* saved LCR for DW APB WAR */

  >>>+#endif

  >>    There was already 'lcr' field there, couldn't it be used?

  > Possibly but the current driver doesn't always save the LCR value
before trying to write it. For example see serial8250_set_termios()

  >       serial_outp(up, UART_LCR, cval);                /* reset DLAB */
  >       up->lcr = cval;                                 /* Save LCR */

     This certainly may be fixed.

  > It's impossible to ensure that going foward the driver will always
save the value before writing it.
  > We need to have it saved before since the write will cause an
interrupt, hence the save in serial_out.

     You may rework driver to always save it on write to 'lcr' field (in
case
of your UART).  I don't think it's going to spoil something there...

  > If that's not acceptable I can audit the driver and ensure all LCR
writes are first saved.

     What's *certainly* undesirable is #ifdef mess. :-)

  >>>@@ -333,6 +340,10 @@
  >>>  static void
  >>>  serial_out(struct uart_8250_port *up, int offset, int value)
  >>>  {
  >>>+#ifdef CONFIG_PMC_MSP
  >>>+    /* Save the offset before it's remapped */
  >>>+    int dwapb_offset = offset;
  >>>+#endif
  >>>     offset = map_8250_out_reg(up, offset) << up->port.regshift;
  >>>
  >>>     switch (up->port.iotype) {
  >>>@@ -342,7 +353,19 @@
  >>>             break;
  >>>
  >>>     case UPIO_MEM:
  >>>+#ifdef CONFIG_PMC_MSP
  >>>+            /* Save the LCR value so it can be re-written when a
  >>>+             * Busy Detect interrupt occurs. */
  >>>+            if (dwapb_offset == UART_LCR)
  >>>+                    up->dwapb_lcr = value;
  >>>+#endif
  >>>             writeb(value, up->port.membase + offset);
  >>>+#ifdef CONFIG_PMC_MSP
  >>>+            /* Re-read the IER to ensure any interrupt disabling has
  >>>+             * completed before proceeding with ISR. */
  >>>+            if (dwapb_offset == UART_IER)
  >>>+                    value = serial_in(up, dwapb_offset); #endif
  >>>             break;

  >>    Hm, was there really a need for #ifdef mess here?
  >>    I'd vote for introducing new UPIO_* here, like was done
  >>for TSi10x UARTs just for the same reason.

  > I'm willing to do this, however IIRC there was a thread in late Sept.
which came
  > to the conclusion that UPIO were to be used for different access
methods  and not UART types.

     AFAIR, almost every participant was left with his own opinion. I myself
changed it twice during the discussion, to finalyl mostly agree with
Russell. :-D

  > Do you see this as an exception?

     Well, there's already an incident of using this to work around the
register access errata (that UPIO_TSI I mentioned) -- and I must note that
this is certainly cleaner than #ifdef's, which should be avoided at all
costs. :-)

  > In the second #ifdef CONFIG_PMC_MSP above the workaround is required
because of SoC
  > interrupt design which is out-of-band with respect to r/w of UART
registers, it's not
  > specific to the DesignWare UART.

     Erm... so why is this under #ifdef?

  >>>-1141,6 +1175,12 @@
  >>>                     iir = serial_in(up, UART_IIR);
  >>>                     if (lsr & UART_LSR_TEMT && iir &
  >>
  >>UART_IIR_NO_INT)
  >>
  >>>                             transmit_chars(up);
  >>>+            } else if (up->bugs & UART_BUG_DWTHRE) {
  >>>+                    unsigned char lsr, iir;
  >>>+                    lsr = serial_in(up, UART_LSR);
  >>>+                    iir = serial_in(up, UART_IIR);
  >>>+                    if (lsr & UART_LSR_THRE)
  >>>+                            transmit_chars(up);

  >>    I don't see how this *really* differs from the UART_BUG_TXEN case.
  >>    Have you tried *that* workaround?

  > I didn't write the code so I haven't tried it personally but I
believe it was investigated.

  > It looks like the results of the bugs are similar but the causes are
different. In the UART_BUG_TXEN case,
  > if I understand the comment correctly, NO interrupt is generated on
enabling THRI.
  > This is verified by looking for Transmitter Empty (0x40) and no
interrupt.

     I must note that "transmitter empty" condition in *not* the cause of
the
THRI interrupt -- it signifies that the TX shift register is empty, not
the TX
holding register.

  > In the UART_BUG_DWTHRE case an interrupt IS generated on enabling THRI.

     If there was no prior sent characters, how it's generated?

  > However no new THRE interupts will occur until a new character is
written
to the THR and it's sent.
  > This is verified by looking for Transmit-Hold-Register Empty (0x20).

     Again, THRE condition doesn't mean that the charecter is actually
sent. I
only means that it's been stored to the shift register and so, the
transmission started...

  >>      In any case, looks like this errata is auto-detectable just
like UART_BUG_TXEN.

  > I don't know how we would be able to test this without sending junk
test characters
  > to the console port.

     IIUC, you must *not* send characters to detect it. :-)

  > We currently enable the bug flag in our platform setup code when we
know the bug is present from the SoC version.
  > Is that not acceptable?

     Well, if that errata is indeed not readily detectable at runtime (or
even
effectively the same as already handled),
this seems like the only option indeed...

  >>>@@ -1366,6 +1406,31 @@
  >>>                     handled = 1;
  >>>
  >>>                     end = NULL;
  >>>+#ifdef CONFIG_PMC_MSP
  >>>+            } else if ((iir & UART_IER_BUSY) == UART_IER_BUSY) {

  >>    Hm, masking IIR with IER mask, is this correct? Doubt it.

  > I agree, that was badly named. I've changed it to UART_IIR_BUSY for
the next spin.

  >>>+                    /*
  >>>+                     * The MSP (DesignWare APB UART) serial
subsystem has a
  >>>+                     * non-standard interrupt condition (0x7) which
means
  >>>+                     * that the LCR was written while the UART was
busy, so
  >>>+                     * the LCR was not actually written.  It is
cleared by
  >>>+                     * reading the special non-standard extended
UART status
  >>>+                     * register.
  >>>+                     */
  >>>+                    unsigned int tmp;
  >>>+                    if( up->port.line == 0 )
  >>>+                            tmp = *UART0_STATUS_REG;
  >>>+                    else
  >>>+                            tmp = *UART1_STATUS_REG;
  >>>+
  >>>+                    /* Check if saved on LCR write */
  >>>+                    if( up->dwapb_lcr != -1 )
  >>>+                            serial_outp(up, UART_LCR, up->dwapb_lcr);
  >>>+                    else
  >>>+                            printk(KERN_ERR "serial8250: UART BUSY,
no LCR write!\n" );
  >>>+
  >>>+                    handled = 1;
  >>>+                    end = NULL;
  >>>+#endif

  >>    Not sure if this also shouldn't be handled in other
  >>places which check for interrupt status, like serial8250_timeout()...

  > I can move the code to a function but I still see two issues:
  > A) We could move the code the a new function. We could also check for
a new UART_BUG_* flag before calling the function,

  > but in reality this is a feature of the UART not a bug.

     May also check for certain UPIO_* once it's introduced...

  > B) How to eliminate the platform #ifdef. How to pass in the address
of the UARTx_STATUS_REG in a platform independent way?

     I'd consider defining the UART status reg. in serial_reg.h and also
doing
reads via serial_in(),
again under a new UPIO_* case...

  > We could add it to one of the data structures like uart_port, but it
would need an #ifdef in the header file.

     Add what, register?

  >>>Index: linux_2_6/include/linux/serial_reg.h
  >>>===================================================================
  >>>RCS file: linux_2_6/include/linux/serial_reg.h,v
  >>>retrieving revision 1.1.1.2
  >>>retrieving revision 1.3
  >>>diff -u -r1.1.1.2 -r1.3
  >>>--- linux_2_6/include/linux/serial_reg.h     19 Oct 2006 18:29:50
-0000      1.1.1.2
  >>>+++ linux_2_6/include/linux/serial_reg.h     19 Oct 2006 19:45:04
-0000      1.3
  >>>@@ -218,6 +218,10 @@
  >>>  #define UART_FCR_PXAR16    0x80    /* receive FIFO treshold = 16 */
  >>>  #define UART_FCR_PXAR32    0xc0    /* receive FIFO treshold = 32 */

  >>>+/*
  >>>+ * DesignWare APB UART
  >>>+ */
  >>>+#define UART_IER_BUSY               0x07    /* Busy Detect */

  >>    Are you sure it's not *IIR* value?  Doesn't look like
  >>interrupt mask for IER. And IIR value of 7 already means
  >>something else, namely, no interrupt and receiver status. Hm...

  > As mentioned earlier I have now renamed this UART_IIR_BUSY.

  > From serial_reg.h, the receiver status is 0x06 and no interrupt is
0x01. I thought these couldn't both be set at the same time?

  > In any case this is how DesignWare implemented the status so we can't
change it now.

     Well, bits 1-2 have no meaning when bit 0 is set. Probably, chip
designers
decided to abuse this. :-)

  > Thanks for the feedback,
  > Marc

MBR, Sergei


             reply	other threads:[~2007-01-22 20:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-22 20:35 Marc St-Jean [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-02-16 17:06 Marc St-Jean
2007-02-16 17:21 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-02-16 16:30 Marc St-Jean
2007-02-13 22:11 Marc St-Jean
2007-02-12 17:46 Marc St-Jean
2007-02-12 17:56 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-02-09 19:39 Marc St-Jean
2007-02-10 17:30 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-02-07 20:50 Marc St-Jean
2007-02-06 16:52 Marc St-Jean
2007-01-27  0:28 Marc St-Jean
2007-01-25 23:10 Marc St-Jean
2007-01-26 13:58 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-01-24 21:10 Marc St-Jean
2007-01-25 14:29 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-01-24 16:48 Marc St-Jean
2007-01-24 20:38 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-01-24 16:40 Marc St-Jean
2007-01-24 19:40 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-01-23 22:37 Marc St-Jean
2007-01-23 23:41 ` Alan
2007-01-24 15:33 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-01-22 20:34 Marc St-Jean
2007-01-22 19:07 Marc St-Jean

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45B52018.3010409@pmc-sierra.com \
    --to=marc_st-jean@pmc-sierra.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] serial driver PMC MSP71xx, kernel linux-mips.git mast er' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).