LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maynard Johnson <maynardj@us.ibm.com>
To: Maynard Johnson <maynardj@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] Cell SPU task notification - repost of patch with updates
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:39:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45BA8310.6020809@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45AE471C.8040909@us.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 469 bytes --]
This patch makes all the changes suggested by Christopher, with the
exception of the suggestion to use the sched_flags field versus a new
member to the spu_context struct to signal the need to "notify already
active". I don't have the sched_flags change in my 2.6.20-rc1 tree. I
can send another patch later if/when the sched_flags changes appears in
the kernel version we end up picking for final oprofile-spu development.
Comments welcome. Thanks.
-Maynard
[-- Attachment #2: spu-notifier.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 4589 bytes --]
Subject: Enable SPU switch notification to detect currently active SPU tasks.
From: Maynard Johnson <maynardj@us.ibm.com>
This patch adds to the capability of spu_switch_event_register so that the
caller is also notified of currently active SPU tasks. It also exports
spu_switch_event_register and spu_switch_event_unregister.
Signed-off-by: Maynard Johnson <mpjohn@us.ibm.com>
Index: linux-2.6.20-rc1/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.20-rc1.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c 2007-01-18 16:43:14.324526032 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc1/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c 2007-01-26 16:16:35.219668640 -0600
@@ -78,21 +78,46 @@
static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(spu_switch_notifier);
-static void spu_switch_notify(struct spu *spu, struct spu_context *ctx)
+void spu_switch_notify(struct spu *spu, struct spu_context *ctx)
{
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&spu_switch_notifier,
ctx ? ctx->object_id : 0, spu);
}
+static void notify_spus_active(void)
+{
+ int node;
+ /* Wake up the active spu_contexts. When the awakened processes
+ * sees their notify_active flag is set, they will call
+ * spu_switch_notify();
+ */
+ for (node = 0; node < MAX_NUMNODES; node++) {
+ struct spu *spu;
+ mutex_lock(&spu_prio->active_mutex[node]);
+ list_for_each_entry(spu, &spu_prio->active_list[node], list) {
+ struct spu_context *ctx = spu->ctx;
+ spu->notify_active = 1;
+ wake_up_all(&ctx->stop_wq);
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&spu_prio->active_mutex[node]);
+ }
+}
+
int spu_switch_event_register(struct notifier_block * n)
{
- return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&spu_switch_notifier, n);
+ int ret;
+ ret = blocking_notifier_chain_register(&spu_switch_notifier, n);
+ if (!ret)
+ notify_spus_active();
+ return ret;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spu_switch_event_register);
int spu_switch_event_unregister(struct notifier_block * n)
{
return blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&spu_switch_notifier, n);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spu_switch_event_unregister);
static inline void bind_context(struct spu *spu, struct spu_context *ctx)
Index: linux-2.6.20-rc1/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/spufs.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.20-rc1.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/spufs.h 2007-01-18 16:43:14.340523600 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc1/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/spufs.h 2007-01-26 16:26:49.733703448 -0600
@@ -180,6 +180,7 @@
int spu_activate(struct spu_context *ctx, u64 flags);
void spu_deactivate(struct spu_context *ctx);
void spu_yield(struct spu_context *ctx);
+void spu_switch_notify(struct spu *spu, struct spu_context *ctx);
int __init spu_sched_init(void);
void __exit spu_sched_exit(void);
Index: linux-2.6.20-rc1/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/run.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.20-rc1.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/run.c 2007-01-18 16:43:14.340523600 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc1/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/run.c 2007-01-26 16:24:38.979744856 -0600
@@ -45,9 +45,10 @@
u64 pte_fault;
*stat = ctx->ops->status_read(ctx);
- if (ctx->state != SPU_STATE_RUNNABLE)
- return 1;
+
spu = ctx->spu;
+ if (ctx->state != SPU_STATE_RUNNABLE || spu->notify_active)
+ return 1;
pte_fault = spu->dsisr &
(MFC_DSISR_PTE_NOT_FOUND | MFC_DSISR_ACCESS_DENIED);
return (!(*stat & 0x1) || pte_fault || spu->class_0_pending) ? 1 : 0;
@@ -305,6 +306,7 @@
u32 *npc, u32 *event)
{
int ret;
+ struct spu * spu;
u32 status;
if (down_interruptible(&ctx->run_sema))
@@ -318,8 +320,16 @@
do {
ret = spufs_wait(ctx->stop_wq, spu_stopped(ctx, &status));
+ spu = ctx->spu;
if (unlikely(ret))
break;
+ if (unlikely(spu->notify_active)) {
+ spu->notify_active = 0;
+ if (!(status & SPU_STATUS_STOPPED_BY_STOP)) {
+ spu_switch_notify(spu, ctx);
+ continue;
+ }
+ }
if ((status & SPU_STATUS_STOPPED_BY_STOP) &&
(status >> SPU_STOP_STATUS_SHIFT == 0x2104)) {
ret = spu_process_callback(ctx);
Index: linux-2.6.20-rc1/include/asm-powerpc/spu.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.20-rc1.orig/include/asm-powerpc/spu.h 2007-01-18 16:43:19.932605072 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc1/include/asm-powerpc/spu.h 2007-01-24 12:17:30.209676992 -0600
@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@
void* pdata; /* platform private data */
struct sys_device sysdev;
+ int notify_active;
};
struct spu *spu_alloc(void);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-26 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-12 22:03 [PATCH] Cell SPU task notification Maynard Johnson
2007-01-15 2:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-01-15 20:21 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-01-15 22:39 ` [PATCH] Cell SPU task notification -- updated patch: #1 Maynard Johnson
2007-01-17 0:30 ` [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] Cell SPU task notification Christoph Hellwig
2007-01-17 15:56 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-01-19 3:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-01-26 22:39 ` Maynard Johnson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45BA8310.6020809@us.ibm.com \
--to=maynardj@us.ibm.com \
--cc=arnd.bergmann@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--subject='Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] Cell SPU task notification - repost of patch with updates' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).