LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Ossman <>
To: Jan Engelhardt <>
Cc:, LKML <>
Subject: Re: ncpfs and TCP vs UDP
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:03:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0701271550210.22295@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Well, probably the same reason as NFS over UDP is discouraged. See nfs(5)
> section WARNINGS (in short: IP fragment ID can wrap quite fast on Gigabit)

I have no such warning in my nfs(5), but I am aware of this yes.
Somewhat amusing that both nfs and ncpfs tend to default to using udp
with this in mind. ;)


     -- Pierre Ossman

  Linux kernel, MMC maintainer
  PulseAudio, core developer
  rdesktop, core developer

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-27 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-26 15:54 Pierre Ossman
2007-01-26 21:20 ` vandrove
2007-01-27 14:51   ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-27 15:03     ` Pierre Ossman [this message]
2007-01-27 16:06       ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: ncpfs and TCP vs UDP' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).