LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chris Friesen" <>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <>,
	Kevin Nicoll <>,
Subject: Re: Multiple ip= boot arguments?
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:24:35 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>> or if I'm supposed to use a startup script instead.
>> This is the preffered way nowadays. One day, hopefully,
>> CONFIG_IP_PNP can go away.
> It could be done reasonably easy, you know... :-/

If CONFIG_IP_PNP is going to go away, what is the proposed mechanism for 
netboot devices to determine the proper source address to use when 
searching for a rootfs to use?


  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-30  0:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-29 18:36 Kevin Nicoll
2007-01-29 20:48 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-30  0:00   ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-01-30  0:24     ` Chris Friesen [this message]
2007-01-30  0:27       ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found]   ` <>
2007-01-30  9:07     ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: Multiple ip= boot arguments?' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).