LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 許恆嘉 <edward_hsu@realtek.com.tw>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Cc: jeff@garzik.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hiwu@realtek.com.tw
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19.2] r8169: support RTL8169SC/8110SC
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 10:56:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45C93FCC.4080609@realtek.com.tw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070206213827.GA25119@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>



Francois Romieu 提到:

>edward_hsu@realtek.com.tw :
>[...]
>  
>
>>ANS_2:
>>So, do you think that it is a good idea to keep other vendos's PID and
>>DID in the part?
>>    
>>
>
>Yes.
>  
>

ANS_3:

OK! I will do it.

>[...]
>  
>
>>ANS_2:
>>
>>Sure! You are right. RTL8110SC, RTL8111B and RTL8101E have modest
>>differences, now. However, RTL8101E is a PCI-E fast ethernet controller.
>>I don't think is a good idea to merge its Linux driver into r8168.c or
>>r8169.c. RTL8110SC is the final version of Realtek PCI gigabit ethernet
>>controller. Moreover, due to the increasing popularity of PCI-E, Realtek
>>is going to design several generations of PCI-E ethernet controllers to
>>satisfy customer requests. I have discussed this issue with my hardware
>>colleagues. They believe that both MAC register layout and tx/rx
>>descriptor layout will be changed a lot in new PCI-E ICs. Actually, they
>>already did. Therefore, the hardwares of RTL8111B(PCI-E gigabit
>>ethernet) and RTL8101E(PCI-E fast ethernet) will have frequent and
>>drastic changes. So, I think that it's a good moment to separate their
>>Linux drivers, and r8169.c can become stable.
>>    
>>
>
>Well, code and facts will tell. :o)
>
>Since you asked for questions:
>
>- will the ~7k limit for the jumbo frames be fixed ? One can hardly call
>  it a feature.
>  
>
ANS_3:

Realtek does implement 7k limit for jumbo frames. I think there is no standard to require how large a jumbo frame should be implemented.


>- out of curiosity, did you try the current in-kernel r8169 driver with
>  a 8111B or a 8101E ?
>  
>
ANS_3:
Yes I did! I tried Linux kernel 2.6.19. It seems that r8169.c supports 
RTL8111B and RTL8101E.

>- is there any plan to open the programming manuals of the PCI-E chipsets ?
>  
>
ANS_3:
Realtek does not have the plan to open  the programming manuals of the 
PCI-E chipsets.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-07  2:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-02  8:17 許恆嘉
2007-02-03  0:39 ` Francois Romieu
2007-02-05  3:47   ` 許恆嘉
2007-02-06  0:31     ` Francois Romieu
2007-02-06  2:44       ` 許恆嘉
2007-02-06 21:38         ` Francois Romieu
2007-02-07  2:56           ` 許恆嘉 [this message]
2007-02-07  3:25           ` 許恆嘉
2007-02-07 23:49             ` Francois Romieu
2007-02-08  1:18               ` 許恆嘉
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-02-02  7:08 許恆嘉
2007-02-02  8:03 ` Andrey Panin
2007-02-02  8:06 ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45C93FCC.4080609@realtek.com.tw \
    --to=edward_hsu@realtek.com.tw \
    --cc=hiwu@realtek.com.tw \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 2.6.19.2] r8169: support RTL8169SC/8110SC' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).