From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932923AbXBPCJP (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:09:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932922AbXBPCJP (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:09:15 -0500 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:33491 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932491AbXBPCJO (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:09:14 -0500 Message-ID: <45D51248.5070408@garzik.org> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:09:12 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070130) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Andrew Morton , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Alan Cox , "Luck, Tony" , Zhang Yanmin Subject: Re: [git patches] libata updates (mostly fixes) References: <20070215233411.GA10782@havoc.gtf.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.7 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.3 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> diff --git a/arch/ia64/Kconfig b/arch/ia64/Kconfig >> index db185f3..d51f0f1 100644 >> --- a/arch/ia64/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/ia64/Kconfig >> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ config IA64 >> >> config 64BIT >> bool >> + select ATA_NONSTANDARD if ATA >> default y > > Ok, this is just _strange_. Agreed. > Tying ATA_NONSTANDARD into ia64 by tying it to the 64BIT config variable > may work (well, I _assume_ it does), but it's just psychedelic. AFAICT it's an attempt to do an unconditional 'select'. I'm /not/ disputing its psychedilic properties, certainly, just figured that was the way that IA64 arch folks did stuff like this. > How about adding a separate config entry like > > config IA64_ATA > bool > depends on ATA > select ATA_NONSTANDARD > default y > > which kind of makes sense when you squint just the right way.. Either way, that seems sane to me. I'd love to have some IA64 folks to comment though. Jeff