LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vatsa@in.ibm.com,
ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, xemul@sw.ru, linux-mm@kvack.org,
svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH][1/4] RSS controller setup
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:43:24 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45D98654.2020005@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6599ad830702190118r20b477d3q254c167c2fc2732@mail.gmail.com>
Paul Menage wrote:
> On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> This output is hard to parse and to extend. I'd suggest either two
>> separate files, or multi-line output:
>>
>> usage: %lu kB
>> limit: %lu kB
>
> Two separate files would be the container usage model that I
> envisaged, inherited from the way cpusets does things.
>
> And in this case, it should definitely be the limit in one file,
> readable and writeable, and the usage in another, probably only
> readable.
>
> Having to read a file called memctlr_usage to find the current limit
> sounds wrong.
>
That sound right, I'll fix this.
> Hmm, I don't appear to have documented this yet, but I think a good
> naming scheme for container files is <subsystem>.<whatever> - i.e.
> these should be memctlr.usage and memctlr.limit. The existing
> grandfathered Cpusets names violate this, but I'm not sure there's a
> lot we can do about that.
>
Why <subsystem>.<whatever>, dots are harder to parse using regular
expressions and sound DOS'ish. I'd prefer "_" to separate the
subsystem and whatever :-)
>> > +static int memctlr_populate(struct container_subsys *ss,
>> > + struct container *cont)
>> > +{
>> > + int rc;
>> > + if ((rc = container_add_file(cont, &memctlr_usage)) < 0)
>> > + return rc;
>> > + if ((rc = container_add_file(cont, &memctlr_limit)) < 0)
>>
>> Clean up the first file here?
>
> Containers don't currently provide an API for a subsystem to clean up
> files from a directory - that's done automatically when the directory
> is deleted.
>
> I think I'll probably change the API for container_add_file to return
> void, but mark an error in the container itself if something goes
> wrong - that way rather than all the subsystems having to check for
> error, container_populate_dir() can do so at the end of calling all
> the subsystems' populate methods.
>
It should be easy to add container_remove_file() instead of marking
an error.
> Paul
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-19 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-19 6:50 [RFC][PATCH][0/4] Memory controller (RSS Control) Balbir Singh
2007-02-19 6:50 ` [RFC][PATCH][1/4] RSS controller setup Balbir Singh
2007-02-19 8:57 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-19 9:18 ` Paul Menage
2007-02-19 11:13 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2007-02-19 19:43 ` Matthew Helsley
2007-02-19 10:06 ` Balbir Singh
2007-02-19 6:50 ` [RFC][PATCH][2/4] Add RSS accounting and control Balbir Singh
2007-02-19 8:58 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-19 10:37 ` [ckrm-tech] " Balbir Singh
2007-02-19 11:01 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-19 11:09 ` Balbir Singh
2007-02-19 11:23 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-19 11:56 ` Balbir Singh
2007-02-19 12:09 ` Paul Menage
2007-02-19 14:10 ` Balbir Singh
2007-02-19 16:07 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2007-02-19 16:17 ` Balbir Singh
2007-02-20 6:40 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2007-02-19 6:50 ` [RFC][PATCH][3/4] Add reclaim support Balbir Singh
2007-02-19 8:59 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-19 10:50 ` Balbir Singh
2007-02-19 11:10 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-19 11:16 ` Balbir Singh
2007-02-19 9:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-02-19 10:52 ` Balbir Singh
2007-02-19 6:50 ` [RFC][PATCH][4/4] RSS controller documentation Balbir Singh
2007-02-19 8:54 ` [RFC][PATCH][0/4] Memory controller (RSS Control) Andrew Morton
2007-02-19 9:06 ` Paul Menage
2007-02-19 9:50 ` [ckrm-tech] " Kirill Korotaev
2007-02-19 9:50 ` Paul Menage
2007-02-19 10:24 ` Balbir Singh
2007-02-19 10:39 ` Balbir Singh
2007-02-19 9:16 ` Magnus Damm
2007-02-19 10:45 ` Balbir Singh
2007-02-19 11:56 ` Magnus Damm
2007-02-19 14:07 ` Balbir Singh
2007-02-19 10:00 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45D98654.2020005@in.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@sw.ru \
--subject='Re: [RFC][PATCH][1/4] RSS controller setup' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).