LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
To: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
Cc: Alex Riesen <fork0@users.sourceforge.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-git13 kernel BUG at /mnt/md0/devel/linux-git/kernel/time/tick-sched.c:168
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:18:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45DC38B2.1000208@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6bffcb0e0702171441i6ac69ac0yb1c46dbf8f43dc2e@mail.gmail.com>
Michal Piotrowski napisał(a):
> On 17/02/07, Alex Riesen <fork0@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>> Thomas Gleixner, Sat, Feb 17, 2007 16:14:17 +0100:
>> > On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 15:47 +0100, Alex Riesen wrote:
>> > > > > 164 if (need_resched())
>> > > > > 165 goto end;
>> > > > > 166
>> > > > > 167 cpu = smp_processor_id();
>> > > > > 168 BUG_ON(local_softirq_pending());
>> > > >
>> > > > Hmm, the BUG_ON is inside of an interrupt disabled region, so we
>> should
>> > > > have bailed out early in the need_resched() check above (because
>> we are
>> > > > in the idle task context according to the stack trace).
>> > > >
>> > > > Is this reproducible ?
>> > >
>> > > Seen this too (Ubuntu, P4/ht-SMT, SATA, typed from screen):
>> >
>> > Can you please apply the patch below, so we can at least see, which
>> > softirq is pending. This should trigger independently of hrtimers and
>> > dynticks. You can keep it compiled in and disable it at the kernel
>> > commandline with "nohz=off" and / or "highres=off"
>>
>> It did, only one time:
>>
>> Idle: local softirq pending: 0020<6>USB Universal Host Controller
>> Interface driver v3.0
>>
>
> sudo cat /var/log/messages | grep Idle
> Feb 17 17:35:34 bitis-gabonica kernel: Idle: local softirq pending:
> 0020<6>hdd: ATAPI 48X DVD-ROM DVD-R CD-R/RW drive, 2048kB Cache,
> UDMA(33)
> Feb 17 19:20:01 bitis-gabonica kernel: Idle: local softirq pending:
> 0020<3>Idle: local softirq pending: 0020<3>Idle: local softirq
> pending: 0020<7>PM: Removing info for No Bus:vcs7
>
> cat /proc/interrupts
> CPU0 CPU1
> 0: 232838 0 IO-APIC-edge timer
> 1: 401 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042
> 7: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge parport0
> 8: 1 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc
> 9: 1 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi
> 12: 4 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042
> 14: 319 0 IO-APIC-edge ide0
> 15: 1612 0 IO-APIC-edge ide1
> 16: 16494 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb3, libata
> 17: 4670 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb4
> 18: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb2
> 19: 2 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb5
> 20: 2822 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi Intel ICH5
> 21: 2881 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi eth1
> 22: 58 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi eth0
> NMI: 0 0
> LOC: 232562 232846
> ERR: 0
> MIS: 0
>
> I can confirm that this is ICH5 SATA controller problem.
Here is something interesting
cat /var/log/messages | tail -n 300 | grep NOHZ
Feb 20 20:09:39 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 20
Feb 20 20:09:39 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 20
Feb 20 21:10:01 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 20
Feb 20 23:20:01 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 20
Feb 21 05:10:28 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02
Feb 21 05:10:46 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02
^^^^^^^^^
Feb 21 05:10:57 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 20
Feb 21 05:11:48 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02
Feb 21 05:12:02 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 20
Feb 21 05:12:02 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 20
Feb 21 05:12:23 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02
Feb 21 05:12:29 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 20
Feb 21 05:13:27 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 20
Feb 21 05:13:49 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02
Feb 21 05:13:54 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 20
Feb 21 05:14:48 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02
Feb 21 05:15:11 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 20
Feb 21 05:15:13 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 20
Feb 21 05:15:16 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02
Feb 21 05:16:18 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 20
Feb 21 05:16:31 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02
Feb 21 05:17:03 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02
Feb 21 05:17:06 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 20
Feb 21 05:17:09 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 20
Feb 21 05:17:12 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02
Feb 21 05:17:17 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 20
Feb 21 05:17:18 bitis-gabonica kernel: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02
^^^^^^^^
23 times in 7 minutes.
Regards,
Michal
--
Michal K. K. Piotrowski
LTG - Linux Testers Group (PL)
(http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/ltg/)
LTG - Linux Testers Group (EN)
(http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/linux_testers_group_en/)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-21 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-16 20:38 2.6.20-git13 kernel BUG at /mnt/md0/devel/linux-git/kernel/time/tick-sched.c:168 Michal Piotrowski
2007-02-16 21:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-02-16 21:24 ` Michal Piotrowski
[not found] ` <20070217144752.GA2503@steel.home>
2007-02-17 15:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
[not found] ` <20070217164652.GA2579@steel.home>
2007-02-17 18:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-02-17 22:41 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-02-18 8:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
[not found] ` <20070218095037.GA3408@steel.home>
2007-02-18 12:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
[not found] ` <20070218172410.GA2421@steel.home>
2007-02-19 1:00 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-02-21 12:18 ` Michal Piotrowski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45DC38B2.1000208@googlemail.com \
--to=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=fork0@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).