From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751998AbXB0WrY (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:47:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752113AbXB0WrY (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:47:24 -0500 Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.33.237]:48121 "EHLO outmail1.freedom2surf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751998AbXB0WrY (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:47:24 -0500 Message-ID: <45E4B33D.8080705@f2s.com> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:39:57 +0000 From: Ian Molton Organization: The Dragon Roost User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0a1 (X11/20061107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton , Ian Molton , Stephen Hemminger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] udivdi3: 64 bit divide References: <20070226173517.66bf0fec@freekitty> <20070227122437.da27c3cd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070227131840.672d6932@localhost> <20070227133656.c452fbb4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070227222430.GC10380@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20070227222430.GC10380@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Russell King wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:36:56PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:18:40 -0800 Stephen Hemminger wrote: >>> Then we should pull the existing udivdi3 implementations? >> Not much point really. Some architectures have gone and done that, but x86 >> has not. x86 has enough coverage for us to pick up most problems, and any >> remaining problems are obviously in scruffy architectures which don't care >> about performance ;) > > I doubt arm26 uses udivdi3, but that's something Ian would have to > confirm. I doubt it is used also, however I am not in a position to test this until at least after I have moved house. Please leave alone for now.