LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roberto Nibali <>
To: Yinghai Lu <>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <>,
	"Kok, Auke" <>,
	Bill Davidsen <>, Adrian Bunk <>,
	Andrew Morton <>,,,, Jesse Brandeburg <>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled eepro100 removal
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:19:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

>> Sounds sane to me.  My overall opinion on eepro100 removal is that we're
>> not there yet.  Rare problem cases remain where e100 fails but eepro100
>> works, and it's older drivers so its low priority for everybody.
>> Needs to happen, though...
> It seems that several Tyan Opteron base system that were using IPMI
> add on card.  the IPMI card share intel 100Mhz nic onboard. you need
> to use eepro100 instead of e100 otherwise the e100 will shutdown OOB
> (out of Band) connection for IPMI when shut down the OS.

I find it hard to believe that something as common as IPMI in 
conjunction with the IPMI technology wasn't tested in Intel's lab. From 
my experience with Intel Server boards, onboard IPMI (all offered 
versions) and e100/e1000 NICs, I've never ever experienced any problems 
operating the BMC over the NIC. Also, I don't quite understand you point 
about the "IPMI card sharing the 100Mbit/s NIC" onboard? What exactly is 

Best regards,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
'[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq' | dc

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-29  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-25 14:58 Adrian Bunk
2007-03-28 22:17 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-03-28 22:26   ` Kok, Auke
2007-03-28 22:42     ` Jeff Garzik
2007-03-29  5:08       ` Yinghai Lu
2007-03-29  8:19         ` Roberto Nibali [this message]
2007-03-29 16:22           ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2007-03-30 16:40             ` Bill Davidsen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-02-20  0:06 Adrian Bunk
2007-01-02 21:57 Adrian Bunk
2007-01-03  0:07 ` Eric Piel
2007-01-03 22:14   ` Jesse Brandeburg
2007-01-03  9:10 ` Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled eepro100 removal' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).