LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <teheo@suse.de>
To: linux@horizon.com
Cc: cebbert@redhat.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
jens.axboe@oracle.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@dale.us, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, neilb@suse.de
Subject: Re: 2.6.20.3 AMD64 oops in CFQ code
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:11:45 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46125291.5080404@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070403130334.14799.qmail@science.horizon.com>
linux@horizon.com wrote:
> linux@horizon.com wrote:
>>> Anyway, what's annoying is that I can't figure out how to bring the
>>> drive back on line without resetting the box. It's in a hot-swap enclosure,
>>> but power cycling the drive doesn't seem to help. I thought libata hotplug
>>> was working? (SiI3132 card, using the sil24 driver.)
>
>> Yeah, it's working but failing resets are considered highly dangerous
>> (in that the controller status is unknown and may cause something
>> dangerous like screaming interrupts) and port is muted after that. The
>> plan is to handle this with polling hotplug such that libata tries to
>> revive the port if PHY status change is detected by polling. Patches
>> are available but they need other things to resolved to get integrated.
>> I think it'll happen before the summer.
>
>> Anyways, you can tell libata to retry the port by manually telling it to
>> rescan the port (echo - - - > /sys/class/scsi_host/hostX/scan).
>
> Ah, thank you! I have to admit, that is at least as mysterious as any
> Microsoft registry tweak.
Polling hotplug should fix this. I thought I would be able to merge it
much earlier. I apparently was way too optimistic. :-(
>>> (H'm... after rebooting, reallocated sectors jumped from 26 to 39.
>>> Something is up with that drive.)
>
>> Yeap, seems like a broken drive to me.
>
> Actually, after a few rounds, the reallocated sectors stabilized at 56
> and all is working well again. It's like there was a major problem with
> error handling.
>
> The problem is that I don't know where the blame lies.
I'm pretty sure it's the firmware's fault. It's not supposed to go out
for lunch like that even when internal error occurs.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-03 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-22 12:38 linux
2007-03-22 18:41 ` Jens Axboe
2007-03-22 18:54 ` linux
2007-03-22 19:00 ` Jens Axboe
2007-03-22 23:59 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-23 0:31 ` Dan Williams
2007-03-23 0:33 ` Dan Williams
2007-03-23 0:44 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-23 17:46 ` linux
2007-04-03 5:49 ` Tejun Heo
2007-04-03 13:03 ` linux
2007-04-03 13:11 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2007-04-04 23:22 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-04-05 4:13 ` Lee Revell
2007-04-05 4:29 ` Tejun Heo
2007-03-22 18:43 ` Aristeu Sergio Rozanski Filho
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46125291.5080404@suse.de \
--to=teheo@suse.de \
--cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@dale.us \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--subject='Re: 2.6.20.3 AMD64 oops in CFQ code' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).