From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756039AbXD0QBr (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:01:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756041AbXD0QBq (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:01:46 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:37018 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756039AbXD0QBp (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:01:45 -0400 Message-ID: <46321E5E.9010909@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:01:34 -0400 From: Chuck Ebbert Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com CC: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: [patch 18/38] Improved oops output. References: <20070427140503.087958775@de.ibm.com> <20070427140516.013904506@de.ibm.com> <20070427142506.GA12738@infradead.org> <1177687465.23773.2.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1177687465.23773.2.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Martin Schwidefsky wrote: >> So we're growing in-kernel disassemblers now? :) >> >> I wonder whether this is really worth it, but at least your handwritten >> one is much nicer than the copy & paste from gdb in the kdb patches. > > The disassembler uses about 8K of memory and it really helps in > debugging. For me it is worth the cost. > No ksymoops for your architecture?