LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bill Davidsen <>
To: Martin Steigerwald <>
Subject: Re: Best CONFIG_HZ value for scheduler testing?
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:29:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Hi Con and Ingo!
> What would be the best CONFIG_HZ value for scheduler testing? I used 
> 1000HZ for a long time, but use 300HZ since 2.6.20. This worked well 
> enough for sd-0.46 and previous versions and ck patches...
That's a good point, all the tests I've done are at 1000, that's just my 
default and I didn't bother to change it.

Bill Davidsen <>
   "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-28 19:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-27  8:44 Martin Steigerwald
2007-04-28 19:29 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2007-04-29 14:07 ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: Best CONFIG_HZ value for scheduler testing?' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).