LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>,
	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
	jamagallon@ono.com, tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: New format Intel microcode...
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:27:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4683EF87.1050303@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1183039975.14676.12.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>

On 06/28/2007 10:12 AM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> (while I work for Intel this is not an official Intel statement, but
> there is so much FUD going around now that I feel I need to at least
> point out a few things others "forget")
>> Slashdot carried an article this morning saying that an error in Intel 
>> microcode was being fixed.
> 
> don't just always believe everything you read on slashdot please
> 
>>  However, it listed only Windows related sites 
>> for the "fix" download. Is this the same TLB issue? And are these really 
>> fixes for Windows to flush the TLB properly the way Linux does?
> 
> First of all, Linux has microcode updates as well. Some of the more
> hypish news-bulletins just conveniently "forgot" about this. Basically
> all distributions ship them, so users who use the distro update tools
> get these automatically. And the update mentioned has been shipping for
> a while (in version 1.17).
> 

Fedora 6 has version 1.13
Fedora 7 also has 1.13
RHEL 5 has 1.15
Debian stable has 1.15 (9 Oct 2006)
Suse 10.1 has 1.13



  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-06-28 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-22 23:45 Daniel J Blueman
2007-03-23  0:43 ` Shaohua Li
2007-03-23  9:43   ` Marcel Holtmann
2007-03-23  9:03     ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-03-26  8:34       ` Marcel Holtmann
2007-03-26  8:52         ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-06-26 21:42   ` Daniel J Blueman
2007-06-26 23:29     ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-28 13:53       ` Bill Davidsen
2007-06-28 14:12         ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-06-28 15:48           ` Alex Riesen
2007-06-28 17:27           ` Chuck Ebbert [this message]
2007-06-28 17:29             ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-06-28 17:54             ` Daniel J Blueman
2007-06-28 15:27         ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-28 15:44           ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-06-28 22:55             ` Bill Davidsen
2007-06-28 22:23           ` Bill Davidsen
2007-06-28 22:30             ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-06-28 23:09             ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-02  8:56   ` Alex Riesen
2007-07-02 17:18     ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-07-02 18:22       ` Alex Riesen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4683EF87.1050303@redhat.com \
    --to=cebbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.blueman@gmail.com \
    --cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=jamagallon@ono.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    --cc=tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk \
    --subject='Re: New format Intel microcode...' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).