LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
Marc Lehmann <linux-kernel@tst.eu>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: epoll design problems with common fork/exec patterns
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:36:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47266064.9030306@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071027173828.GY10199@1wt.eu>
Willy Tarreau wrote:
>> On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Marc Lehmann wrote:
>>
>>>> Please provide some code to illustrate one exact problem you have.
>>> // assume there is an open epoll set that listens for events on fd 5
>>> if (fork () = 0)
>>> {
>>> close (5);
>>> // fd 5 is now removed from the epoll set of the parent.
>>> _exit (0);
>>> }
..
> from what I understand, Marc is not asking for the code above to remove
> the fd from the epoll set, but he's in fact complaining that he *observed*
> that the fd was removed from the epoll set in the *parent* process when
> the child closes it, which is of course not expected at all. As strange
> as it looks like, this might need investigation. It is possible that there
> is some strange bug somewhere in some kernel versions.
>
> Marc, I think that if you indicate the last kernel version on which you
> observed this and provide a very short and easy reproducer, it would
> help everyone investigating this. Basically something which reports "OK"
> or "KO".
That's how I read it, too.
So basically, a program like this, perhaps.
Except that, here running 2.6.23.1, it works just fine (no removal bug).
#include <sys/epoll.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
static int del_from_epoll_set (int efd, int fd, const char *msg)
{
struct epoll_event e;
memset(&e, 0, sizeof(e));
e.data.fd = fd;
if (epoll_ctl(efd, EPOLL_CTL_DEL, fd, &e) == -1) {
int err = errno;
fprintf(stderr, "epoll_ctl(DEL) failed (%s): %s\n", msg, strerror(err));
return -1;
}
return 0;
}
static int add_to_epoll_set (int efd, int fd, __uint32_t events, const char *msg)
{
struct epoll_event e;
memset(&e, 0, sizeof(e));
e.events = events;
e.data.fd = fd;
if (epoll_ctl(efd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, fd, &e) == -1) {
int err = errno;
fprintf(stderr, "epoll_ctl(ADD) failed (%s): %s\n", msg, strerror(err));
return -1;
}
return 0;
}
int main (int argc, char **argv)
{
int efd, sd, fds[2];
pid_t cpid;
if (pipe(fds) == -1) {
perror("pipe()");
exit(1);
}
sd = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
if (sd == -1) {
perror("socket");
exit(1);
}
efd = epoll_create(5);
if (efd == -1) {
perror("epoll_create");
exit(1);
}
if (add_to_epoll_set(efd, fileno(stdin), EPOLLIN, "stdin"))
exit(1);
if (add_to_epoll_set(efd, fileno(stdout), EPOLLOUT, "stdout"))
exit(1);
if (add_to_epoll_set(efd, fds[0], EPOLLIN, "pipe_read"))
exit(1);
if (add_to_epoll_set(efd, fds[1], EPOLLOUT, "pipe_write"))
exit(1);
if (add_to_epoll_set(efd, sd, EPOLLIN|EPOLLOUT, "socket"))
exit(1);
// assume there is an open epoll set that listens for events on fd 5
cpid = fork();
if (cpid == 0) {
close(fileno(stdin));
close(fileno(stdout));
close(fds[0]);
close(fds[1]);
close(sd);
exit(0);
}
waitpid(cpid, NULL, 0);
// now test whether the fd's are still in the epoll set:
add_to_epoll_set(efd, sd, EPOLLIN|EPOLLOUT, "sd");
add_to_epoll_set(efd, fds[0], EPOLLIN, "fds[0]");
add_to_epoll_set(efd, fds[1], EPOLLOUT, "fds[1]");
add_to_epoll_set(efd, fileno(stdin), EPOLLIN, "fileno(stdin)");
add_to_epoll_set(efd, fileno(stdout), EPOLLOUT, "fileno(stdout)");
del_from_epoll_set(efd, sd, "sd");
del_from_epoll_set(efd, fds[0], "fds[0]");
del_from_epoll_set(efd, fds[1], "fds[1]");
del_from_epoll_set(efd, fileno(stdin), "fileno(stdin)");
del_from_epoll_set(efd, fileno(stdout), "fileno(stdout)");
printf("Done.\n");
exit(0);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-29 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-27 6:22 Marc Lehmann
2007-10-27 8:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-10-27 8:51 ` Marc Lehmann
2007-10-27 9:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-10-27 9:34 ` Marc Lehmann
2007-10-27 10:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-10-27 10:46 ` Marc Lehmann
2007-10-27 16:59 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-10-27 17:38 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-10-27 18:01 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-10-29 22:36 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2007-10-28 4:47 ` David Schwartz
2007-10-28 9:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-10-28 21:04 ` David Schwartz
2007-10-29 18:55 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-02-26 15:13 ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-02-26 18:51 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-02-27 1:30 ` Chris "ク" Heath
2008-02-27 19:35 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-02-28 13:12 ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-02-28 13:23 ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-02-28 19:34 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-02-28 19:23 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-02-29 15:46 ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-02-29 19:19 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-02-29 19:54 ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-03-02 15:11 ` Sam Varshavchik
2008-03-02 21:44 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-10-28 18:48 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47266064.9030306@rtr.ca \
--to=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@tst.eu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
--subject='Re: epoll design problems with common fork/exec patterns' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).