Re: [Scst-devel] Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel

[Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@vlnb.net>]

Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2008 5:25 PM, Joe Landman <landman@scalableinformatics.com> wrote:
> 
>>Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
>>
>>>Actually, I don't know what kind of conclusions it is possible to make
>>>from disktest's results (maybe only how throughput gets bigger or slower
>>>with increasing number of threads?), it's a good stress test tool, but
>>>not more.
>>
>>Unfortunately, I agree.  Bonnie++, dd tests, and a few others seem to
>>bear far closer to "real world" tests than disktest and iozone, the
>>latter of which does more to test the speed of RAM cache and system call
>>performance than actual IO.
> 
> 
> I have ran some tests with Bonnie++, but found out that on a fast
> network like IB the filesystem used for the test has a really big
> impact on the test results.
> 
> If anyone has a suggestion for a better test than dd to compare the
> performance of SCSI storage protocols, please let it know.

I would suggest you to try something from real life, like:

  - Copying large file tree over a single or multiple IB links

  - Measure of some DB engine's TPC

  - etc.

> Bart Van Assche.
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Scst-devel mailing list
> Scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scst-devel
>