LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] enhanced NFS ESTALE error handling (v2)
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 16:29:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47A38F33.9050505@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1201900017.11291.43.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>

Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 15:58 -0500, Peter Staubach wrote:
>   
>> Hi.
>>
>> The patch enhanced the ESTALE error handling for NFS mounted
>> file systems.  It expands the number of places that the NFS
>> client checks for ESTALE returns from the server.
>>
>> It also enhances the ESTALE handling for directories by
>> occasionally retrying revalidation to check to see whether the
>> directory becomes valid again.  This sounds odd, but can occur
>> when a systems administrator, accidently or unknowingly,
>> unexports a file system which is in use.  All active
>> non-directory files become permanently inaccessible, but
>> directories can be become accessible again after the
>> administrator re-exports the file system.  This is a situation
>> that users have been complaining about for years and this
>> support can help to alleviate their situations.
>>     
>
> As far as I can see, this patch can be applied separately from the VFS
> fixes. If so, would it make sense for me to take charge of this patch in
> the NFS tree, while Andrew queues up the other two VFS changes in -mm?

Yes, I think that this would make good sense.

    Thanx...

       ps


  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-01 21:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-18 15:36 [PATCH 3/3] enhanced ESTALE error handling Peter Staubach
2008-02-01 20:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] enhanced NFS ESTALE error handling (v2) Peter Staubach
2008-02-01 21:06   ` Trond Myklebust
2008-02-01 21:29     ` Peter Staubach [this message]
2008-03-10 20:23   ` [PATCH 3/3] enhanced NFS ESTALE error handling (v3) Peter Staubach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47A38F33.9050505@redhat.com \
    --to=staubach@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 3/3] enhanced NFS ESTALE error handling (v2)' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).