LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <>
To: Nick Piggin <>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <>,
	Linus Torvalds <>,
	Andrew Morton <>,
	LKML <>,
Subject: Re: [git pull] more SLUB updates for 2.6.25
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 08:29:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

Nick Piggin a écrit :
> On Friday 08 February 2008 13:13, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>   git:// slub-linus
>> (includes the cmpxchg_local fastpath since the cmpxchg_local work
>> by Matheiu is in now, and the non atomic unlock by Nick. Verified that
>> this is not doing any harm after some other patches had been removed.
> Ah, good. I think it is always a good thing to be able to remove atomics.
> They place quite a bit of burden on the CPU, especially x86 where it also
> has implicit memory ordering semantics (although x86 can speculatively
> get around much of the problem, it's obviously worse than no restriction)
> Even if perhaps some cache coherency or timing quirk makes the non-atomic
> version slower (all else being equal), then I'd still say that the non
> atomic version should be preferred.

What about IRQ masking then ?

Many CPU pay high cost for cli/sti pair...

And SLAB/SLUB allocators, even if only used from process context, want to 
disable/re-enable interrupts...

I understand kmalloc() want generic pools, but dedicated pools could avoid 
this cli/sti

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-08  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-08  2:13 Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08  7:12 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-08  7:29   ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2008-02-08  8:08     ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-08  8:10     ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-09 11:25       ` Eric Dumazet
2008-02-08 14:58     ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [git pull] more SLUB updates for 2.6.25' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).