LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	tony.luck@intel.com, anton@samba.org, paulus@samba.org,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [BUID_FAILURE] regression from 2.6.24-git18 to 2.6.25-rc1-git1 on section type conflict psmouse-base
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:17:02 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47B16B16.60402@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080212093614.GF2959@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>

Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:59:29PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:10:02 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This build failure is seen on the powerpc from the 2.6.24-git18 kernel and is still visible
>>> in the 2.6.25-rc1-git1.
>>>
>>> drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-base.c:44: error: __param_proto causes a section type conflict
>>> drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-base.c:44: error: __param_proto causes a section type conflict
>>> make[3]: *** [drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-base.o] Error 1
>>> make[2]: *** [drivers/input/mouse] Error 2
>>> make[1]: *** [drivers/input] Error 2
>>>
>>> The patch http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/8/514 seems to have not taken into 2.6.25-rc1 and 
>>> 2.6.25-rc1-git(s). Is there any new patch i am missing out.
>> I have it queued up, along with quite a few other things, but for the next
>> couple of days I have logistical problems which are preventing me from
>> doing runtime testing.
> 
> And this really isn't a regression.
> 
> It seems Kamalesh has upgraded his gcc to 4.2 between trying 
> 2.6.24-git18 and trying 2.6.25-rc1-git1?
> 
> cu
> Adrian
> 
Hi Adrian,

I am using the gcc version

gcc (GCC) 4.2.3 20071014 (prerelease) (Debian 4.2.2-3)

It has been the same gcc version from 2.6.24-git18 to 2.6.25-rc1-git{1,2).
This build failure is seen from 2.6.24-git18 and is still seen in 2.6.25-rc1-git{1,2}.

-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Kamalesh Babulal,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM, ISTL.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-12  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-12  7:40 Kamalesh Babulal
2008-02-12  7:59 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-12  9:36   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-12  9:47     ` Kamalesh Babulal [this message]
2008-02-12  9:55       ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-12 12:10         ` Kamalesh Babulal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47B16B16.60402@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --subject='Re: [BUID_FAILURE] regression from 2.6.24-git18 to 2.6.25-rc1-git1 on section type conflict psmouse-base' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).