LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 5/5] signal(ia64_ia32): add a signal stack overflow check
@ 2008-02-18 10:27 Shi Weihua
  2008-02-19  2:26 ` Shi Weihua
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Shi Weihua @ 2008-02-18 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tony.luck; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-ia64

The similar check has been added to x86_32(i386) in commit
id 83bd01024b1fdfc41d9b758e5669e80fca72df66.
So we add this check to ia64_ia32 and improve it a liitle bit in that
we need to check for stack overflow only when the signal is on stack.

Signed-off-by: Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com> 

---
--- linux-2.6.25-rc2.orig/arch/ia64/ia32/ia32_signal.c	2008-02-16 04:57:20.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc2/arch/ia64/ia32/ia32_signal.c	2008-02-18 18:12:49.000000000 +0800
@@ -766,8 +766,19 @@ get_sigframe (struct k_sigaction *ka, st
 
 	/* This is the X/Open sanctioned signal stack switching.  */
 	if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_ONSTACK) {
-		if (!on_sig_stack(esp))
+		int onstack = sas_ss_flags(esp);
+
+		if (onstack == 0)
 			esp = current->sas_ss_sp + current->sas_ss_size;
+		else if (onstack == SS_ONSTACK) {
+			/*
+			 * If we are on the alternate signal stack and would
+			 * overflow it, don't return an always-bogus address
+			 * instead so we will die with SIGSEGV.
+			 */
+			if (!likely(on_sig_stack(esp - frame_size)))
+				return (void __user *) -1L;
+		}
 	}
 	/* Legacy stack switching not supported */
 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 5/5] signal(ia64_ia32): add a signal stack overflow check
  2008-02-18 10:27 [PATCH 5/5] signal(ia64_ia32): add a signal stack overflow check Shi Weihua
@ 2008-02-19  2:26 ` Shi Weihua
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Shi Weihua @ 2008-02-19  2:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tony.luck; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-ia64

The similar check has been added to x86_32(i386) in commit
id 83bd01024b1fdfc41d9b758e5669e80fca72df66.
So we add this check to ia64_ia32 and improve it a liitle bit in that
we need to check for stack overflow only when the signal is on stack.

Signed-off-by: Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com> 

---

The previous patch has a comment mistake. Now I correct it.

---
--- linux-2.6.25-rc2.orig/arch/ia64/ia32/ia32_signal.c	2008-02-16 04:57:20.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc2/arch/ia64/ia32/ia32_signal.c	2008-02-19 09:57:28.000000000 +0800
@@ -766,8 +766,19 @@ get_sigframe (struct k_sigaction *ka, st
 
 	/* This is the X/Open sanctioned signal stack switching.  */
 	if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_ONSTACK) {
-		if (!on_sig_stack(esp))
+		int onstack = sas_ss_flags(esp);
+
+		if (onstack == 0)
 			esp = current->sas_ss_sp + current->sas_ss_size;
+		else if (onstack == SS_ONSTACK) {
+			/*
+			 * If we are on the alternate signal stack and would
+			 * overflow it, don't. Return an always-bogus address
+			 * instead so we will die with SIGSEGV.
+			 */
+			if (!likely(on_sig_stack(esp - frame_size)))
+				return (void __user *) -1L;
+		}
 	}
 	/* Legacy stack switching not supported */
 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-19  2:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-02-18 10:27 [PATCH 5/5] signal(ia64_ia32): add a signal stack overflow check Shi Weihua
2008-02-19  2:26 ` Shi Weihua

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).