From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757075AbYBZDZb (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:25:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759294AbYBZDZH (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:25:07 -0500 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:63175 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758323AbYBZDZF (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:25:05 -0500 Message-ID: <47C3862D.8080603@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:23:25 +0800 From: Li Zefan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: menage@google.com CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, balbir@in.ibm.com, pj@sgi.com, Pavel Emelianov , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , YAMAMOTO Takashi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] CGroup API files: Various cleanup to CGroup control files References: <20080223224725.115590000@menage.corp.google.com> In-Reply-To: <20080223224725.115590000@menage.corp.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org menage@google.com wrote: > This patchset is a roll-up of the non-contraversial items of the > various patches that I've sent out recently, fixed according to the > feedback received. > > In summary they are: > > - general rename of read_uint/write_uint to read_u64/write_u64 > > - use these methods for cpusets and memory controller files > > - add a read_map cgroup file method, and use it in the memory > controller > > - move the "releasable" control file to the debug subsystem > > - make the debug subsystem config option default to "n" > > The only user-visible changes are the movement of the "releasable" > file and the fact that some write_u64()-based control files are now > more forgiving of additional whitespace at the end of their input. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Menage > > -- > -- Should those pathces be rebased againt 2.6.25-rc3 ?