LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
To: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>
Cc: "adam radford" <aradford@gmail.com>,
"Tony Battersby" <tonyb@cybernetics.com>,
"Johannes Wörner" <johannes.woerner@tuebingen.mpg.de>,
"James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Performance problems with 3ware 9500S-4LP and 2.6.25-rc3
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:55:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47C5C048.9080704@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080227101143.GC30767@skl-net.de>
Andre Noll wrote:
> On 13:33, Chris Snook wrote:
>
>>> During the daily cron job that uses rsync to sync a 500G file system
>> >from another machine to the raid on the 3ware controller the load
>>> jumps up, and the machine becomes sluggish as hell. For example, an
>>> ssh login to that machine takes minutes to complete and ldap becomes
>>> unreliable while the rsync job is running. Even Nagios complains
>>> about the machine being down while rsync is running.
>> You're putting your box under astronomical load. This is generally
>> regarded as a bad idea, regardless of how well your storage controller
>> is performing.
>
> The machine becomes sluggish also when I write directly to the raid
> array. A simple
>
> dd if=/dev/zero of=tmpfile
>
> shouldn't push the load up to 4, right?
Actually, it's normal for pdflush to spawn up to 8 threads when you're
dirtying memory faster than it can be written to disk. Load going to 4
is not abnormal. ssh logins taking minutes is very abnormal.
>> Can you measure the single-threaded throughput (say,
>> coping one huge file, and then syncing) to give us a baseline
>> performance figure?
>
> Single threaded throughput seems to be ok (140M/s). The problem is
> that the machine becomes unresponsive.
Does the machine become unresponsive during the single-threaded test, or
only when doing the rsync?
-- Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-27 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-26 17:43 Andre Noll
2008-02-26 17:54 ` Bernd Schubert
2008-02-27 10:10 ` Andre Noll
2008-02-26 18:33 ` Chris Snook
2008-02-27 10:11 ` Andre Noll
2008-02-27 19:55 ` Chris Snook [this message]
2008-02-28 9:46 ` Andre Noll
2008-02-26 23:07 ` Arnd Hannemann
2008-02-27 10:11 ` Andre Noll
2008-02-27 14:26 ` Tony Battersby
2008-02-27 17:05 ` Andre Noll
2008-02-27 20:06 ` adam radford
2008-02-28 9:46 ` Andre Noll
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47C5C048.9080704@redhat.com \
--to=csnook@redhat.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=aradford@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes.woerner@tuebingen.mpg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maan@systemlinux.org \
--cc=tonyb@cybernetics.com \
--subject='Re: Performance problems with 3ware 9500S-4LP and 2.6.25-rc3' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).