LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: bad paravirt/Xen interaction in "x86 - Enhance DEBUG_RODATA support - alternatives"
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:09:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47C87488.9030205@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47C8717F.3030009@zytor.com>
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> The patch "x86 - Enhance DEBUG_RODATA support - alternatives" enables
>> the kernel for writing by clearing X86_CR0_WP allow privileged
>> writes. This won't work in a paravirt environment for two reasons:
>>
>> 1. the kernel may not be running in ring 0, so writes will still be
>> prevented
>> 2. the hypervisor prevents X86_CR0_WP from being cleared anyway (it
>> GPFs the cr0 update)
>>
>> This crashes on Xen, and it would probably break VMI too.
(lguest too, of course)
>> The only safe way to allow writes is to change the page permissions
>> (either on the page itself, or create a temporary writable alias for
>> that page). Perhaps something you could do it with kmap_atomic.
>>
>
> A properly implemented hypervisor should arguably emulate this.
>
> Doesn't really mean the patch is worth the pain.
No, it would be irritating to implement.
Seems to me that doing the update in a temporary kmap_atomic mapping
would be a more straightforward way to go, anyway. How would you
implement this on a processor without something like X86_CR0_WP?
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-29 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-29 20:39 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-02-29 20:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-02-29 21:09 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-03-03 17:30 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-03-03 17:35 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-03 17:58 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-03-03 18:03 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-03 18:05 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-03-03 20:53 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-03-03 22:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-03-04 4:12 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-02-29 21:24 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47C87488.9030205@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
--subject='Re: bad paravirt/Xen interaction in "x86 - Enhance DEBUG_RODATA support - alternatives"' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).