LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <>
To: Mark Lord <>
Cc: Hugo Mills <>,,
Subject: Re: Spurious completions during NCQ
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:56:27 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

Mark Lord wrote:
> Tejun, have the spurious completion fixes been backported
> to 2.6.23 / 2.6.22 yet ?  Those kernels will be in common use
> for some time to come, and this fix is more or less essential.

Not that I know of.  I'm prepping patches now.



  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-06  5:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-15 13:46 Spurious completions during NCQ Hugo Mills
2008-02-15 15:00 ` Calvin Walton
2008-02-15 15:04   ` Hugo Mills
2008-02-15 15:37     ` Michael Tokarev
2008-02-16 14:08 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-06  5:56   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2008-03-06  6:05     ` Tejun Heo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-10-13 13:12 Marco Lamberto
2007-09-07 17:57 Sumanth J.V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).