LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Pawel Plociennik <paplociennik@gmail.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] chroot= as a new kernel parameter
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 07:17:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47D00B16.6040004@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080306102712.GE13391@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>
>> Pawel Plociennik wrote:
>>> Hi Andrew and other *real* hackers,
>>>
>>> I have sent a *last* version of a patch which it has added a new kernel parameter chroot=
>>> It were discusioned a *long time* on a lkml so I hope that it will has been applied.
>> It has been discussed and *rejected* a large number of times.
>>
>> This is completely useless bloat.
>
> why is it useless? Would it be more acceptable were it made dependent on
> a .config option?
>
It's useless because it's exactly and trivially replaceable with:
init=/path/to/any/sbin/chroot /newroot /sbin/init
The last thing we want is to pile more stuff into the in-kernel
initialization code, and no, making it a config option makes it even worse.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-06 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-06 5:01 Pawel Plociennik
2008-03-06 4:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-06 10:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-06 15:17 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2008-03-06 20:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-06 21:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-06 21:20 ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-06 21:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-06 22:05 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2008-03-07 10:36 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2008-03-07 12:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-06 21:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-06 21:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-06 22:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-07 4:53 ` Greg Schafer
2008-03-07 9:27 ` Måns Rullgård
2008-03-06 16:54 ` Pawel Plociennik
2008-03-06 15:47 ` Pawel Plociennik
2008-03-06 10:34 ` Chris Wedgwood
2008-03-06 10:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-06 11:22 ` Chris Wedgwood
2008-03-06 11:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-06 11:53 ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-06 19:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-06 20:57 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-03-07 8:23 ` Chris Wedgwood
2008-03-07 21:04 devzero
2008-03-07 22:32 ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-08 14:10 Al Boldi
2008-03-08 14:28 ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-08 16:34 ` Al Boldi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47D00B16.6040004@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paplociennik@gmail.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] chroot= as a new kernel parameter' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).