LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, andi@firstfloor.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] x86, fpu: lazy allocation of FPU area - v3
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 04:29:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47D1352F.6010504@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080306202446.GA4225@ucw.cz>

Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Thu 2008-03-06 16:51:41, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
>>
>>>>> kmem_cache_alloc() can fail (return NULL) and not handling it is a 
>>>>> bug.
>>>> oops. you are correct. Will send a sigsegv in the failure case then. 
>>>> Thanks.
>>> You are introducing possibility of hard to debug error, where previous 
>>> code just worked... Does not look like good idea to me.
>> hm, how does it differ from any other allocation failure? We could fail 
> 
> Well, we should not be sending SIGSEGV...? SIGBUS would be cleaner, or
> SIGKILL... what happens when userland tries to catch this one?
> 

I'm confused...

Normally when we need memory for userspace and can't get it, we put the 
process to sleep until memory is available.

Why is this different in any way?

	-hpa

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-03-07 12:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-03 23:02 [patch 1/2] x86, fpu: split FPU state from task struct " Suresh Siddha
2008-03-03 23:02 ` [patch 2/2] x86, fpu: lazy allocation of FPU area " Suresh Siddha
2008-03-04  1:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-03-04  1:43     ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-04 10:32       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-04 17:55         ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-05 19:47           ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-06 15:51             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-06 19:10               ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-06 20:24               ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-06 20:52                 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-07 12:29                 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2008-03-07 13:06                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-03-07 13:18                     ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-07 13:20                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-03-07 13:27                         ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-05 19:48   ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-06 19:26     ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-06 21:21       ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-04  1:18 ` [patch 1/2] x86, fpu: split FPU state from task struct " Christoph Hellwig
2008-03-04  1:36   ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-04  8:20     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-06 12:39     ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-03-04 10:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-04 17:59   ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-04 20:53     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47D1352F.6010504@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --subject='Re: [patch 2/2] x86, fpu: lazy allocation of FPU area - v3' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).