LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 03/17] sched: rt-group: full hierarchy support for the rt groups
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:38:32 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47D7E3E0.3040401@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1205314176.8514.219.camel@twins>

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 13:59 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Dhaval Giani
>> <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>         On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 06:08:53PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra
>>         wrote:
>>         > Update the -rt bits to support the full hierarchy support
>>         started by Dhaval.
>>         >
>>         
>>         
>>         Thanks for the effort. Just a very minor comment. I will try
>>         these out
>>         and give more feedback.
>>         
>>         
>>         > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
>>         
>>
>> Shouldn't this have Dhaval's signed-off-by as well? Dhaval do you want
>> to sign-off on these patches?
> 
> He can Ack it, but the 3rd patch was not authored by him.
> 

My bad, I saw his sign-off on the first two patches. I got confused due to the
order in which my mailer received the patches.



-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-03-12 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-09 17:08 [RFC/PATCH 00/17] Current sched patch stack Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-09 17:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 01/17] sched: mix tasks and groups Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-01 12:12   ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-04-01 12:05     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-09 17:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 02/17] sched: allow the CFS group scheduler to have multiple levels Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-12 14:47   ` Dhaval Giani
2008-03-09 17:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 03/17] sched: rt-group: full hierarchy support for the rt groups Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-12  8:25   ` Dhaval Giani
     [not found]     ` <661de9470803120129l66497656o948c13c6c0c26766@mail.gmail.com>
2008-03-12  9:29       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-12 13:34         ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-12 13:39           ` Dhaval Giani
2008-03-12 14:08         ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2008-03-09 17:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 04/17] sched: fair-group: SMP-nice for group scheduling Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-09 17:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 05/17] sched: rt-group: optimize dequeue_rt_stack Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-09 17:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 06/17] sched: fair-group scheduling vs latency Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-09 17:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 07/17] sched: fair-group: de-couple load-balancing from the rb-trees Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-09 17:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 08/17] sched: fair-group: single RQ approach Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-09 17:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 09/17] sched: fair: remove moved_group() Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-09 17:09 ` [RFC/PATCH 10/17] sched: remove sysctl_sched_batch_wakeup_granularity Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-09 17:09 ` [RFC/PATCH 11/17] sched: fair: optimize sched_slice() Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-09 17:09 ` [RFC/PATCH 12/17] sched: fair: cfs_root_rq Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-09 17:09 ` [RFC/PATCH 13/17] sched: fair: calc_delta_weight() Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-09 17:09 ` [RFC/PATCH 14/17] sched: fair: avg_vruntime Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-09 17:09 ` [RFC/PATCH 15/17] sched: fair-group: EEVDF scheduling Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-09 17:09 ` [RFC/PATCH 16/17] sched: fair: bound tardiness Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-09 17:09 ` [RFC/PATCH 17/17] sched: fair: optimize the elegebility test Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47D7E3E0.3040401@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --subject='Re: [RFC/PATCH 03/17] sched: rt-group: full hierarchy support for the rt groups' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).