LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geoff Levand <geoffrey.levand@am.sony.com>
To: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
rz@linux-m68k.org, LKML Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] state of GEN_RTC vs rtc subsystem
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 15:45:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48408394.8000406@am.sony.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080220180325.46446675@i1501.lan.towertech.it>
Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:11:23 -0600
> Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Is the functionality provided by drivers/char/gen_rtc.c completely
>> handled by the rtc subsystem in drivers/rtc?
>>
>> I ask for two reasons:
>> 1. should we make it mutually exclusive in Kconfig
>> 2. I've enabled both and get (we'll my defconfig did):
>
> They shouldn't be enabled at once. I think a patch
> for Kconfig has been recently submitted to give a warning
> in such a case.
>
> rtc-cmos should be able to handle the vast majority of x86
> rtcs out there.
gen_rtc was hooked up to the powerpc platform
ppc_md.set_rtc_time and ppc_md.get_rtc_time via the arch
specific get_rtc_time() and set_rtc_time() routines.
>From what I can tell, those generic rtc routines the powerpc
arch provides are not properly hooked into the new rtc subsystem.
This causes problems for multi-platform builds where some platforms
must use gen_rtc, and some must the new rtc subsytem.
-Geoff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-30 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-20 16:11 Kumar Gala
2008-02-20 17:03 ` [rtc-linux] " Alessandro Zummo
2008-02-20 20:37 ` woodys
2008-02-21 0:14 ` [rtc-linux] " Alessandro Zummo
2008-02-22 7:47 ` [rtc-linux] " J.A. Magallón
2008-05-30 22:45 ` Geoff Levand [this message]
2008-06-02 22:27 ` Geoff Levand
2008-06-07 6:38 ` Rogério Brito
2008-06-07 9:46 ` [rtc-linux] " David Woodhouse
2008-02-21 9:26 ` Richard Zidlicky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48408394.8000406@am.sony.com \
--to=geoffrey.levand@am.sony.com \
--cc=alessandro.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=rz@linux-m68k.org \
--subject='Re: [rtc-linux] state of GEN_RTC vs rtc subsystem' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).