LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:18:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48E22720.9030603@yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080930112241.GC21367@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> cat-7717 [000] 1392.941867: __tasklet_schedule <-ath5k_intr
>> cat-7717 [000] 1393.005963: __tasklet_schedule <-ath5k_intr
>> cat-7717 [000] 1393.033222: __switch_to <-schedule
>>
>> Here a schedule seemingly doesn't happen for a few hundredths of a second...
>
> that's about 60 msecs. ath5k_intr IRQ handling overhead? IRQ handlers
> are non-preemptible. (even under CONFIG_PREEMPT=y)
What about the piece leading up to that:
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752092: del_timer <-schedule_timeout
cat-7717 [000] 1392.772263: account_scheduler_latency
<-enqueue_task_fair
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773224: __tasklet_schedule <-kbd_event
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773225: schedule_console_callback
<-kbd_event
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773225: schedule_work
<-schedule_console_callback
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773226: queue_work <-schedule_work
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773232: account_scheduler_latency
<-enqueue_task_fair
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773240: account_scheduler_latency
<-enqueue_task_fair
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773251: schedule_delayed_work
<-put_queue
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773251: queue_delayed_work
<-schedule_delayed_work
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773258: schedule_console_callback
<-kbd_event
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773258: schedule_work
<-schedule_console_callback
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773259: queue_work <-schedule_work
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773267: schedule_console_callback
<-kbd_event
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773268: schedule_work
<-schedule_console_callback
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773268: queue_work <-schedule_work
cat-7717 [000] 1392.807931: account_scheduler_latency
<-enqueue_task_fair
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839464: __tasklet_schedule <-ath5k_intr
Here's a snippet from
http://sucs.org/~sits/test/eeepc-debug/20080929/trace-on-battery.txt.bz2 :
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752092: del_timer <-schedule_timeout
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752092: acpi_ec_check_status
<-acpi_ec_wait
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752093: constant_test_bit
<-acpi_ec_check_status
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752095: mutex_unlock
<-acpi_ec_transaction
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752096: acpi_ex_enter_interpreter
<-acpi_ev_address_space_dispatch
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752097: acpi_os_wait_semaphore
<-acpi_ut_acquire_mutex
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752097: down_timeout
<-acpi_os_wait_semaphore
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752098: acpi_ex_release_global_lock
<-acpi_ex_read_data_from_field
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752099: acpi_ex_release_mutex_object
<-acpi_ex_release_global_lock
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752100: acpi_ev_release_global_lock
<-acpi_ex_release_mutex_object
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752100: __acpi_release_global_lock
<-acpi_ev_release_global_lock
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752101: acpi_os_signal_semaphore
<-acpi_ev_release_global_lock
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752102: up <-acpi_os_signal_semaphore
...
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839447:
acpi_ex_truncate_for32bit_table <-acpi_ds_exec_end_op
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839447: acpi_ps_next_parse_state
<-acpi_ps_parse_loop
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839448: acpi_ps_complete_op
<-acpi_ps_parse_loop
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839448: acpi_ps_complete_this_op
<-acpi_ps_complete_op
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839449: acpi_ps_delete_parse_tree
<-acpi_ps_complete_this_op
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839449: acpi_ps_get_arg
<-acpi_ps_delete_parse_tree
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839450: acpi_ps_get_opcode_info
<-acpi_ps_get_arg
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839450: acpi_ps_get_arg
<-acpi_ps_delete_parse_tree
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839451: acpi_ps_get_opcode_info
<-acpi_ps_get_arg
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839452: do_IRQ <-common_interrupt
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839453: irq_enter <-do_IRQ
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839453: irq_to_desc <-do_IRQ
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839454: handle_fasteoi_irq <-do_IRQ
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839455: handle_IRQ_event
<-handle_fasteoi_irq
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839455: usb_hcd_irq <-handle_IRQ_event
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839456: uhci_irq <-usb_hcd_irq
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839458: ath5k_intr <-handle_IRQ_event
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839459: ath5k_hw_is_intr_pending
<-ath5k_intr
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839461: ath5k_hw_get_isr <-ath5k_intr
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839464: __tasklet_schedule <-ath5k_intr
Why didn't another process cut in from 1392.752092 to 1392.839464? In
the schedule grep normally runs for cat are half as long e.g.:
<idle>-0 [000] 1392.747102: __switch_to <-schedule
cat-7717 [000] 1392.747103: del_timer <-schedule_timeout
cat-7717 [000] 1392.747107:
schedule_timeout_uninterruptible <-msleep
cat-7717 [000] 1392.747107: schedule_timeout
<-schedule_timeout_uninterruptible
cat-7717 [000] 1392.747108: init_timer <-schedule_timeout
cat-7717 [000] 1392.747108: __mod_timer <-schedule_timeout
cat-7717 [000] 1392.747111: __switch_to <-schedule
<idle>-0 [000] 1392.749067: account_scheduler_latency
<-enqueue_task_fair
Further why (after taking a break to process the ath5k interrupt) did it
not schedule another process other than cat until 1393.033226:
cat-7717 [000] 1393.033215: set_normalized_timespec
<-ktime_get_ts
cat-7717 [000] 1393.033216: ktime_add_safe
<-hrtimer_start_range_ns
cat-7717 [000] 1393.033217: ktime_add_safe
<-hrtimer_start_range_ns
cat-7717 [000] 1393.033217: enqueue_hrtimer
<-hrtimer_start_range_ns
cat-7717 [000] 1393.033222: __switch_to <-schedule
hald-addon-inpu-3237 [000] 1393.033226: fget_light <-do_sys_poll
--
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-30 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.ERZTl/6uH+mhNoef5fPJKTRjJag@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.PtPFzP5kIJVCCov6YCewrh+o4z4@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.C6WSm5Rh2Nb+Qho7b0qDOZ9RPV8@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.ch6j4qXs/2sFpLkHz5fXrtjTR8c@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.Jx/Ygtm46CVRawlA6OnfYNn6cN0@ifi.uio.no>
2008-09-18 7:26 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
[not found] ` <fa.iIHgL48F3T5VAqFw3mqaf9Pzrs4@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.Td8xkKZKMSMghlJmEYefTRVF2kc@ifi.uio.no>
2008-09-19 11:54 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-19 14:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-22 11:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-22 12:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-23 6:33 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-23 11:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-23 16:30 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-23 19:39 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-23 22:01 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-27 20:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-28 20:56 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-29 8:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-29 23:11 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-30 11:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-30 13:18 ` Sitsofe Wheeler [this message]
2008-10-04 10:50 ` Reading EeePC900 battery info causes stalls when using SLUB (was Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?) Sitsofe Wheeler
[not found] <fa.vMKgvqjqmYnI2J40GHoTENeYm8U@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.808p0ZtU9DCpeky4KfNS8Drdw9w@ifi.uio.no>
2008-09-17 21:48 ` How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be? Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-17 21:54 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-17 22:29 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-18 2:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-18 18:25 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-19 8:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-17 21:18 Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-17 21:28 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-17 21:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-21 20:56 ` Matt Keenan
2008-09-22 6:50 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48E22720.9030603@yahoo.com \
--to=sitsofe@yahoo.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--subject='Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).