LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
	Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [mm] [PATCH 2/4] Memory cgroup resource counters for hierarchy
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2008 11:19:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <490D3F72.9040408@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081102144237.59ab5f03.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:18:37 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> Add support for building hierarchies in resource counters. Cgroups allows us
>> to build a deep hierarchy, but we currently don't link the resource counters
>> belonging to the memory controller control groups, which are linked in
>> cgroup hiearchy. This patch provides the infrastructure for resource counters
>> that have the same hiearchy as their cgroup counter parts.
>>
>> These set of patches are based on the resource counter hiearchy patches posted
>> by Pavel Emelianov.
>>
>> NOTE: Building hiearchies is expensive, deeper hierarchies imply charging
>> the all the way up to the root. It is known that hiearchies are expensive,
>> so the user needs to be careful and aware of the trade-offs before creating
>> very deep ones.
>>
> ...isn't it better to add "root_lock" to res_counter rather than taking
> all levels of lock one by one ?
> 
>  spin_lock(&res_counter->hierarchy_root->lock);
>  do all charge/uncharge to hierarchy
>  spin_unlock(&res_counter->hierarchy_root->lock);
> 
> Hmm ?
> 

Good thought process, but that affects and adds code complexity for the case
when hierarchy is enabled/disabled. It is also inefficient, since all charges
will now contend on root lock, in the current process, it is step by step, the
contention only occurs on common parts of the hierarchy (root being the best case).

Thanks for the comments,

-- 
	Balbir

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-02  5:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-01 18:48 [mm][PATCH 0/4] Memory cgroup hierarchy introduction Balbir Singh
2008-11-01 18:48 ` [mm] [PATCH 1/4] Memory cgroup hierarchy documentation Balbir Singh
2008-11-04  6:25   ` Paul Menage
2008-11-04  6:26     ` Paul Menage
2008-11-05 13:55       ` Balbir Singh
2008-11-01 18:48 ` [mm] [PATCH 2/4] Memory cgroup resource counters for hierarchy Balbir Singh
2008-11-02  5:42   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-02  5:49     ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2008-11-02  5:56       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-02 11:46         ` Balbir Singh
2008-11-01 18:48 ` [mm] [PATCH 3/4] Memory cgroup hierarchical reclaim Balbir Singh
2008-11-02  5:37   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-02  5:44     ` Balbir Singh
2008-11-04  2:17       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-05 13:34         ` Balbir Singh
2008-11-05 16:20           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-06 14:00             ` Balbir Singh
2008-11-01 18:49 ` [mm] [PATCH 4/4] Memory cgroup hierarchy feature selector Balbir Singh
2008-11-02  5:38   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-02  6:03     ` Balbir Singh
2008-11-02  6:24       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-02 15:52         ` Balbir Singh
2008-11-04  6:37           ` Paul Menage
2008-11-06  7:00             ` Balbir Singh
2008-11-06  7:01               ` Balbir Singh
2008-11-06  6:56         ` Balbir Singh
2008-11-06  7:30           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-04  0:15 ` [mm][PATCH 0/4] Memory cgroup hierarchy introduction KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-05 13:51   ` Balbir Singh
2008-11-05 16:33     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-05 17:52       ` Balbir Singh
2008-11-06  0:22         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-04  9:21 ` [patch 1/2] memcg: hierarchy, yet another one KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-04  9:25 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=490D3F72.9040408@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    --cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
    --subject='Re: [mm] [PATCH 2/4] Memory cgroup resource counters for hierarchy' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).