LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
ananth@in.ibm.com, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: disable preempt for module_text_address()
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:46:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4912222F.9040605@ct.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <491212C0.4030900@redhat.com>
Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> actually, calling __module_text_address() in __register_kprobe() is
>> better after my fix applied. but I found that a line have exceed
>> 80 characters, so I don't use __module_text_address().
>
> I don't think that coding style is a good reason not to fix it...:(
>
> Anyway, I think the issue that you pointed must be fixed.
> I found there were same kind of issues in kprobes and updated
> your patch. This includes fixes which Hiroshi pointed out.
>
> Thanks a lot! :)
>
> __register_kprobe() can be preempted after checking probing address
> but before try_module_get() or module_put(), and in this interval the
> module can be unloaded. In that case, try_module_get(probed_mod) or
> module_put(mod) will access to invalid address, or kprobe will probe
> invalid address.
>
> this patch uses preempt_disable() to protect it and use
> __module_text_address() and __kernel_text_address().
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/kprobes.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Index: 2.6.28-rc3/kernel/kprobes.c
> ===================================================================
> --- 2.6.28-rc3.orig/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ 2.6.28-rc3/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -613,30 +613,37 @@ static int __kprobes __register_kprobe(s
> return -EINVAL;
> p->addr = addr;
>
> - if (!kernel_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr) ||
> - in_kprobes_functions((unsigned long) p->addr))
> + preempt_disable();
> + if (!__kernel_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr) ||
> + in_kprobes_functions((unsigned long) p->addr)) {
> + preempt_enable();
> return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> p->mod_refcounted = 0;
>
> /*
> * Check if are we probing a module.
> */
> - probed_mod = module_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr);
> + probed_mod = __module_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr);
> if (probed_mod) {
> - struct module *calling_mod = module_text_address(called_from);
> + struct module *calling_mod;
> + calling_mod = __module_text_address(called_from);
> /*
> * We must allow modules to probe themself and in this case
> * avoid incrementing the module refcount, so as to allow
> * unloading of self probing modules.
> */
> if (calling_mod && calling_mod != probed_mod) {
One question, off topic.
If calling_mod is NULL, no try_module_get(), is that OK?
thanks,
Hiroshi Shimamoto
> - if (unlikely(!try_module_get(probed_mod)))
> + if (unlikely(!try_module_get(probed_mod))) {
> + preempt_enable();
> return -EINVAL;
> + }
> p->mod_refcounted = 1;
> } else
> probed_mod = NULL;
> }
> + preempt_enable();
>
> p->nmissed = 0;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->list);
> @@ -718,9 +725,11 @@ static void __kprobes __unregister_kprob
> struct kprobe *old_p;
>
> if (p->mod_refcounted) {
> - mod = module_text_address((unsigned long)p->addr);
> + preempt_disable();
> + mod = __module_text_address((unsigned long)p->addr);
> if (mod)
> module_put(mod);
> + preempt_enable();
> }
>
> if (list_empty(&p->list) || list_is_singular(&p->list)) {
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-05 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-04 5:56 Lai Jiangshan
2008-11-04 14:28 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-11-05 0:53 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-11-05 1:27 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-05 1:47 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-11-05 19:30 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-11-05 21:40 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-05 22:46 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto [this message]
2008-11-05 23:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-06 0:06 ` [PATCH] kprobes: bugfix: try_module_get even if calling_mod is NULL Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-07 1:00 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-07 2:28 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-07 2:54 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-07 4:46 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-11-06 1:06 ` [PATCH] kprobes: disable preempt for module_text_address() Lai Jiangshan
2008-11-06 15:37 ` [PATCH] kprobes: disable preempt for module_text_address() and kernel_text_address() Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-07 0:32 ` Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4912222F.9040605@ct.jp.nec.com \
--to=h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] kprobes: disable preempt for module_text_address()' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).