LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	ananth@in.ibm.com, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: disable preempt for module_text_address() and kernel_text_address()
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 08:32:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49138CAD.3000304@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49130F4C.6070603@redhat.com>

Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> __register_kprobe() can be preempted after checking probing address
> but before module_text_address() or try_module_get(), and in this
> interval the module can be unloaded. In that case,
> try_module_get(probed_mod) will access to invalid address,
> or kprobe will probe invalid address.
> 
> this patch uses preempt_disable() to protect it and use
> __module_text_address() and __kernel_text_address().

It's good, Thanks.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
> ---
> 
>>> @@ -718,9 +725,11 @@ static void __kprobes __unregister_kprob
>>>  	struct kprobe *old_p;
>>>
>>>  	if (p->mod_refcounted) {
>>> -		mod = module_text_address((unsigned long)p->addr);
>>> +		preempt_disable();
>>> +		mod = __module_text_address((unsigned long)p->addr);
>>>  		if (mod)
>>>  			module_put(mod);
>>> +		preempt_enable();
>> this is bad fix, we have had a reference to mod. we don't need
>> preempt_disable() before module_put(mod).
> 
> Hmm, Indeed.
> So let's add a comment there.
> 
>  kernel/kprobes.c |   21 ++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: 2.6.28-rc3/kernel/kprobes.c
> ===================================================================
> --- 2.6.28-rc3.orig/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ 2.6.28-rc3/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -613,30 +613,37 @@ static int __kprobes __register_kprobe(s
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	p->addr = addr;
> 
> -	if (!kernel_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr) ||
> -	    in_kprobes_functions((unsigned long) p->addr))
> +	preempt_disable();
> +	if (!__kernel_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr) ||
> +	    in_kprobes_functions((unsigned long) p->addr)) {
> +		preempt_enable();
>  		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> 
>  	p->mod_refcounted = 0;
> 
>  	/*
>  	 * Check if are we probing a module.
>  	 */
> -	probed_mod = module_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr);
> +	probed_mod = __module_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr);
>  	if (probed_mod) {
> -		struct module *calling_mod = module_text_address(called_from);
> +		struct module *calling_mod;
> +		calling_mod = __module_text_address(called_from);
>  		/*
>  		 * We must allow modules to probe themself and in this case
>  		 * avoid incrementing the module refcount, so as to allow
>  		 * unloading of self probing modules.
>  		 */
>  		if (calling_mod && calling_mod != probed_mod) {
> -			if (unlikely(!try_module_get(probed_mod)))
> +			if (unlikely(!try_module_get(probed_mod))) {
> +				preempt_enable();
>  				return -EINVAL;
> +			}
>  			p->mod_refcounted = 1;
>  		} else
>  			probed_mod = NULL;
>  	}
> +	preempt_enable();
> 
>  	p->nmissed = 0;
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->list);
> @@ -718,6 +725,10 @@ static void __kprobes __unregister_kprob
>  	struct kprobe *old_p;
> 
>  	if (p->mod_refcounted) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Since we've already incremented refcount,
> +		 * we don't need to disable preemption.
> +		 */
>  		mod = module_text_address((unsigned long)p->addr);
>  		if (mod)
>  			module_put(mod);
> 



      reply	other threads:[~2008-11-07  0:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-04  5:56 [PATCH] kprobes: disable preempt for module_text_address() Lai Jiangshan
2008-11-04 14:28 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-11-05  0:53   ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-11-05  1:27 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-05  1:47   ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-11-05 19:30     ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-11-05 21:40     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-05 22:46       ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-11-05 23:07         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-06  0:06           ` [PATCH] kprobes: bugfix: try_module_get even if calling_mod is NULL Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-07  1:00             ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-07  2:28               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-07  2:54                 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-07  4:46                   ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-11-06  1:06       ` [PATCH] kprobes: disable preempt for module_text_address() Lai Jiangshan
2008-11-06 15:37         ` [PATCH] kprobes: disable preempt for module_text_address() and kernel_text_address() Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-07  0:32           ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49138CAD.3000304@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] kprobes: disable preempt for module_text_address() and kernel_text_address()' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).